Seek Returns logo

GPN vs. LMT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GPN and LMT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGPNLMT
Company NameGlobal Payments Inc.Lockheed Martin Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization21.15 billion USD120.06 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 16, 2001January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GPN and LMT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GPN vs. LMT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGPNLMT
5-Day Price Return4.94%3.01%
13-Week Price Return8.87%9.63%
26-Week Price Return-11.44%14.62%
52-Week Price Return-11.21%-15.12%
Month-to-Date Return4.94%3.01%
Year-to-Date Return-22.20%5.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.36M1.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.55M1.64M
3-Month Volatility36.14%26.20%
Beta0.840.24

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GPN

6.36%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

GPN’s Return on Equity of 6.36% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LMT

65.82%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
37.11%
Q3
20.14%
Median
11.72%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-6.24%

LMT’s Return on Equity of 65.82% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GPN vs. LMT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GPN

15.07%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

GPN’s Net Profit Margin of 15.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LMT

5.85%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.66%
Q3
8.61%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.92%
Min
1.01%

LMT’s Net Profit Margin of 5.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GPN vs. LMT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GPN

23.26%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

GPN’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.26% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LMT

8.29%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.83%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-2.15%

LMT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.29% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GPN vs. LMT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGPNLMT
Return on Equity (TTM)6.36%65.82%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.96%7.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.07%5.85%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.26%8.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.01%8.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GPN

0.95

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

LMT

0.99

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
2.03
Median
1.24
Q1
1.04
Min
0.77

LMT’s Current Ratio of 0.99 falls into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GPN vs. LMT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GPN

0.74

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

LMT

4.06

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
0.96
Median
0.63
Q1
0.37
Min
0.03

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.06, LMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GPN vs. LMT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GPN

5.15

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

LMT

7.49

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.08
Median
7.25
Q1
2.65
Min
-7.63

LMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GPN vs. LMT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGPNLMT
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.950.99
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.900.83
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.744.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.157.49

Growth

Revenue Growth

GPN vs. LMT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GPN vs. LMT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GPN

1.17%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Yield of 1.17% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LMT

2.57%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.72%
Q3
1.45%
Median
0.48%
Q1
0.08%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.57%, LMT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GPN vs. LMT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GPN

17.30%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.30% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LMT

73.60%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
50.43%
Median
17.11%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 73.60% is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

GPN vs. LMT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGPNLMT
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.17%2.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)17.30%73.60%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GPN

14.77

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

GPN’s P/E Ratio of 14.77 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LMT

28.59

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
67.20
Q3
55.74
Median
33.28
Q1
27.49
Min
15.02

LMT’s P/E Ratio of 28.59 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GPN vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GPN

2.23

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

LMT

1.67

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
4.87
Median
2.47
Q1
1.61
Min
0.33

LMT’s P/S Ratio of 1.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GPN vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GPN

0.86

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

GPN’s P/B Ratio of 0.86 is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LMT

20.34

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.90
Q3
8.93
Median
4.70
Q1
3.03
Min
0.83

At 20.34, LMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GPN vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGPNLMT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)14.7728.59
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.231.67
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.8620.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.7624.11