Seek Returns logo

GPN vs. HON: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GPN and HON, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGPNHON
Company NameGlobal Payments Inc.Honeywell International Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesIndustrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization20.81 billion USD137.77 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 16, 2001January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GPN and HON by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GPN vs. HON: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGPNHON
5-Day Price Return-1.63%-0.55%
13-Week Price Return6.09%-3.53%
26-Week Price Return-17.63%5.71%
52-Week Price Return-21.96%9.02%
Month-to-Date Return7.28%-2.41%
Year-to-Date Return-23.46%-3.94%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.77M3.26M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.19M3.67M
3-Month Volatility37.85%18.85%
Beta1.001.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GPN

6.36%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

GPN’s Return on Equity of 6.36% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HON

32.86%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
14.23%
Median
7.81%
Q1
5.91%
Min
-3.58%

HON’s Return on Equity of 32.86% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GPN vs. HON: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GPN

15.07%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

GPN’s Net Profit Margin of 15.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HON

14.30%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
18.70%
Q3
12.58%
Median
9.26%
Q1
3.87%
Min
-2.26%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.30% places HON in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GPN vs. HON: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GPN

23.26%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

GPN’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.26% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HON

17.81%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
25.69%
Q3
17.03%
Median
12.85%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-0.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.81% places HON in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GPN vs. HON: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGPNHON
Return on Equity (TTM)6.36%32.86%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.96%7.56%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.07%14.30%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.26%17.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.01%38.08%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GPN

0.95

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

HON

1.29

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.64
Median
1.38
Q1
1.13
Min
0.61

HON’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Industrial Conglomerates industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GPN vs. HON: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GPN

0.74

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

HON

2.27

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.47
Median
0.99
Q1
0.66
Min
0.21

HON’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Industrial Conglomerates industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.27. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GPN vs. HON: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GPN

5.15

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

HON

7.76

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
11.17
Q3
8.02
Median
5.88
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

HON’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GPN vs. HON: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGPNHON
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.951.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.900.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.742.27
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.157.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

GPN vs. HON: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GPN vs. HON: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GPN

1.18%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Yield of 1.18% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HON

2.13%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
10.17%
Q3
5.53%
Median
3.14%
Q1
1.88%
Min
0.00%

HON’s Dividend Yield of 2.13% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial Conglomerates industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GPN vs. HON: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GPN

17.30%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.30% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HON

51.34%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
181.91%
Q3
95.57%
Median
50.60%
Q1
35.01%
Min
1.76%

HON’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 51.34% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GPN vs. HON: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGPNHON
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.18%2.13%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)17.30%51.34%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GPN

14.61

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

GPN’s P/E Ratio of 14.61 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HON

24.10

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
36.98
Q3
22.09
Median
12.18
Q1
8.93
Min
5.63

A P/E Ratio of 24.10 places HON in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GPN vs. HON: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GPN

2.20

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

HON

3.45

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
3.60
Q3
2.10
Median
0.68
Q1
0.42
Min
0.11

HON’s P/S Ratio of 3.45 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GPN vs. HON: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GPN

0.86

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

GPN’s P/B Ratio of 0.86 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HON

9.30

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.89
Q3
2.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.60
Min
0.27

At 9.30, HON’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GPN vs. HON: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGPNHON
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)14.6124.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.203.45
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.869.30
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.6927.73