Seek Returns logo

GOOGL vs. WFC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GOOGL and WFC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGOOGLWFC
Company NameAlphabet Inc.Wells Fargo & Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesFinancials
GICS IndustryInteractive Media & ServicesBanks
Market Capitalization2,448.32 billion USD249.52 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateAugust 19, 2004June 1, 1972
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GOOGL and WFC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GOOGL vs. WFC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGOOGLWFC
5-Day Price Return2.77%1.09%
13-Week Price Return27.45%4.02%
26-Week Price Return5.41%-4.34%
52-Week Price Return24.44%49.62%
Month-to-Date Return5.24%-3.40%
Year-to-Date Return6.69%10.89%
10-Day Avg. Volume32.10M14.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume40.67M18.42M
3-Month Volatility24.44%24.32%
Beta0.991.27

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GOOGL

34.31%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.37%
Q3
29.69%
Median
9.73%
Q1
2.47%
Min
-26.19%

In the upper quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, GOOGL’s Return on Equity of 34.31% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

WFC

11.36%

Banks Industry

Max
26.37%
Q3
15.92%
Median
12.25%
Q1
8.69%
Min
0.15%

WFC’s Return on Equity of 11.36% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GOOGL vs. WFC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GOOGL

31.12%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
50.41%
Q3
29.38%
Median
17.14%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-30.88%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.12% places GOOGL in the upper quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

WFC

22.19%

Banks Industry

Max
54.20%
Q3
35.70%
Median
28.97%
Q1
22.53%
Min
6.98%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks industry, WFC’s Net Profit Margin of 22.19% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

GOOGL vs. WFC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GOOGL

32.68%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
65.96%
Q3
36.95%
Median
18.60%
Q1
5.69%
Min
-18.13%

GOOGL’s Operating Profit Margin of 32.68% is around the midpoint for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WFC

25.35%

Banks Industry

Max
63.35%
Q3
44.59%
Median
37.24%
Q1
28.25%
Min
13.37%

WFC’s Operating Profit Margin of 25.35% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

GOOGL vs. WFC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGOOGLWFC
Return on Equity (TTM)34.31%11.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)24.88%1.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)31.12%22.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.68%25.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)58.94%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GOOGL

1.90

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
4.30
Q3
2.68
Median
1.96
Q1
1.21
Min
0.45

GOOGL’s Current Ratio of 1.90 aligns with the median group of the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WFC

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

GOOGL vs. WFC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GOOGL

0.07

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
0.90
Q3
0.47
Median
0.16
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

GOOGL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.07 is typical for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

WFC

2.01

Banks Industry

Max
4.75
Q3
2.62
Median
1.02
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

GOOGL vs. WFC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GOOGL

16.20

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
67.60
Q3
29.41
Median
6.36
Q1
-0.87
Min
-37.02

GOOGL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WFC

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

GOOGL vs. WFC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGOOGLWFC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.90--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.90--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.072.01
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)16.20--

Growth

Revenue Growth

GOOGL vs. WFC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GOOGL vs. WFC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GOOGL

0.40%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
1.87%
Q3
1.08%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GOOGL’s Dividend Yield of 0.40% is consistent with its peers in the Interactive Media & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WFC

2.53%

Banks Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
5.83%
Median
3.81%
Q1
2.50%
Min
0.00%

WFC’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GOOGL vs. WFC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GOOGL

8.54%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
87.35%
Q3
38.67%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GOOGL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 8.54% is within the typical range for the Interactive Media & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WFC

31.00%

Banks Industry

Max
147.07%
Q3
80.55%
Median
54.40%
Q1
35.71%
Min
0.00%

WFC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.00% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

GOOGL vs. WFC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGOOGLWFC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.40%2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)8.54%31.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GOOGL

21.23

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
87.79
Q3
54.33
Median
25.46
Q1
18.76
Min
6.96

GOOGL’s P/E Ratio of 21.23 is within the middle range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

WFC

12.27

Banks Industry

Max
20.05
Q3
12.65
Median
10.21
Q1
7.54
Min
2.74

WFC’s P/E Ratio of 12.27 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GOOGL vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GOOGL

6.61

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
19.01
Q3
12.39
Median
6.49
Q1
1.94
Min
0.22

GOOGL’s P/S Ratio of 6.61 aligns with the market consensus for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

WFC

1.91

Banks Industry

Max
5.06
Q3
2.98
Median
2.24
Q1
1.59
Min
0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

GOOGL vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GOOGL

5.91

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
11.66
Q3
7.17
Median
4.17
Q1
2.80
Min
0.12

GOOGL’s P/B Ratio of 5.91 is within the conventional range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

WFC

1.42

Banks Industry

Max
2.18
Q3
1.36
Median
1.09
Q1
0.81
Min
0.20

WFC’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is in the upper tier for the Banks industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GOOGL vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGOOGLWFC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.2312.27
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.611.91
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.911.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)36.7716.66