Seek Returns logo

GOOGL vs. TEAM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GOOGL and TEAM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGOOGLTEAM
Company NameAlphabet Inc.Atlassian Corporation
CountryUnited StatesAustralia
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesInformation Technology
GICS IndustryInteractive Media & ServicesSoftware
Market Capitalization2,415.52 billion USD43.69 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateAugust 19, 2004December 9, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GOOGL and TEAM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GOOGL vs. TEAM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGOOGLTEAM
5-Day Price Return-1.78%1.31%
13-Week Price Return19.68%-22.34%
26-Week Price Return7.08%-47.29%
52-Week Price Return19.59%4.75%
Month-to-Date Return3.87%-13.16%
Year-to-Date Return5.29%-31.57%
10-Day Avg. Volume28.20M4.10M
3-Month Avg. Volume38.69M2.44M
3-Month Volatility22.73%42.58%
Beta0.990.97

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GOOGL

34.31%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.37%
Q3
29.69%
Median
9.73%
Q1
2.47%
Min
-26.19%

In the upper quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, GOOGL’s Return on Equity of 34.31% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TEAM

-20.69%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

TEAM has a negative Return on Equity of -20.69%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GOOGL vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GOOGL

31.12%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
50.41%
Q3
29.38%
Median
17.14%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-30.88%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.12% places GOOGL in the upper quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TEAM

-4.92%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

TEAM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -4.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GOOGL vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GOOGL

32.68%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
65.96%
Q3
36.95%
Median
18.60%
Q1
5.69%
Min
-18.13%

GOOGL’s Operating Profit Margin of 32.68% is around the midpoint for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TEAM

-2.50%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

TEAM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.50%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GOOGL vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGOOGLTEAM
Return on Equity (TTM)34.31%-20.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)24.88%-4.59%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)31.12%-4.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.68%-2.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)58.94%82.84%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GOOGL

1.90

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
4.30
Q3
2.68
Median
1.96
Q1
1.21
Min
0.45

GOOGL’s Current Ratio of 1.90 aligns with the median group of the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TEAM

1.22

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

TEAM’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GOOGL vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GOOGL

0.07

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
0.90
Q3
0.47
Median
0.16
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

GOOGL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.07 is typical for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TEAM

0.73

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

TEAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.73 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GOOGL vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GOOGL

16.20

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
67.60
Q3
29.41
Median
6.36
Q1
-0.87
Min
-37.02

GOOGL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TEAM

-11.02

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

TEAM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -11.02. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GOOGL vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGOOGLTEAM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.901.22
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.901.17
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.070.73
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)16.20-11.02

Growth

Revenue Growth

GOOGL vs. TEAM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GOOGL vs. TEAM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GOOGL

0.41%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
1.87%
Q3
1.08%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GOOGL’s Dividend Yield of 0.41% is consistent with its peers in the Interactive Media & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TEAM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GOOGL vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GOOGL

8.54%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
87.35%
Q3
38.67%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GOOGL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 8.54% is within the typical range for the Interactive Media & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TEAM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GOOGL vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGOOGLTEAM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.41%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)8.54%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GOOGL

21.01

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
87.79
Q3
54.33
Median
25.46
Q1
18.76
Min
6.96

GOOGL’s P/E Ratio of 21.01 is within the middle range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TEAM

--

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

P/E Ratio data for TEAM is currently unavailable.

GOOGL vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GOOGL

6.54

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
19.01
Q3
12.39
Median
6.49
Q1
1.94
Min
0.22

GOOGL’s P/S Ratio of 6.54 aligns with the market consensus for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TEAM

8.38

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

TEAM’s P/S Ratio of 8.38 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GOOGL vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GOOGL

5.91

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
11.66
Q3
7.17
Median
4.17
Q1
2.80
Min
0.12

GOOGL’s P/B Ratio of 5.91 is within the conventional range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TEAM

39.62

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

At 39.62, TEAM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Software industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GOOGL vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGOOGLTEAM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.01--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.548.38
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.9139.62
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)36.3930.86