Seek Returns logo

GMED vs. PHG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GMED and PHG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GMED is a standard domestic stock, while PHG trades as New York Registered Shares, providing U.S. investors with a way to invest in the foreign-based company.

SymbolGMEDPHG
Company NameGlobus Medical, Inc.Koninklijke Philips N.V.
CountryUnited StatesNetherlands
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesHealth Care Equipment & Supplies
Market Capitalization8.17 billion USD26.62 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateAugust 3, 2012March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockNY Reg Shrs

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GMED and PHG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GMED vs. PHG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGMEDPHG
5-Day Price Return7.20%2.74%
13-Week Price Return2.21%16.41%
26-Week Price Return-17.38%0.64%
52-Week Price Return-13.58%-18.72%
Month-to-Date Return5.61%2.52%
Year-to-Date Return-26.88%-3.20%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.67M1.44M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.39M1.59M
3-Month Volatility37.51%26.08%
Beta1.121.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GMED

8.58%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.93%
Q3
16.99%
Median
9.28%
Q1
5.10%
Min
-12.52%

GMED’s Return on Equity of 8.58% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PHG

-0.18%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.93%
Q3
16.99%
Median
9.28%
Q1
5.10%
Min
-12.52%

PHG has a negative Return on Equity of -0.18%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GMED vs. PHG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GMED

13.58%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
24.41%
Q3
13.71%
Median
10.08%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-5.58%

GMED’s Net Profit Margin of 13.58% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PHG

0.90%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
24.41%
Q3
13.71%
Median
10.08%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-5.58%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s Net Profit Margin of 0.90% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

GMED vs. PHG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GMED

14.93%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
18.11%
Median
15.07%
Q1
8.48%
Min
-0.28%

GMED’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.93% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PHG

6.11%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
18.11%
Median
15.07%
Q1
8.48%
Min
-0.28%

PHG’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.11% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

GMED vs. PHG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGMEDPHG
Return on Equity (TTM)8.58%-0.18%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.13%-0.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.58%0.90%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.93%6.11%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.97%43.85%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GMED

4.07

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.00
Median
2.13
Q1
1.44
Min
0.86

GMED’s Current Ratio of 4.07 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PHG

1.26

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.00
Median
2.13
Q1
1.44
Min
0.86

PHG’s Current Ratio of 1.26 falls into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GMED vs. PHG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GMED

0.00

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.61
Q3
0.76
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, GMED’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PHG

0.81

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.61
Q3
0.76
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

PHG’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.81. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GMED vs. PHG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GMED

3.54

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
56.35
Q3
25.56
Median
9.60
Q1
3.78
Min
-26.49

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, GMED’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.54 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

PHG

1.41

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
56.35
Q3
25.56
Median
9.60
Q1
3.78
Min
-26.49

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GMED vs. PHG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGMEDPHG
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.071.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.090.81
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.81
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.541.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

GMED vs. PHG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GMED vs. PHG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GMED

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.15%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GMED currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PHG

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.15%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG’s Dividend Yield of 0.00% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GMED vs. PHG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GMED

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
66.60%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GMED has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PHG

0.42%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
66.60%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.42% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GMED vs. PHG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGMEDPHG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.42%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GMED

21.99

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
67.29
Q3
47.01
Median
30.94
Q1
23.91
Min
10.79

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, GMED’s P/E Ratio of 21.99 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

PHG

139.46

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
67.29
Q3
47.01
Median
30.94
Q1
23.91
Min
10.79

At 139.46, PHG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GMED vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GMED

2.99

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.49
Q3
5.41
Median
2.86
Q1
2.07
Min
0.74

GMED’s P/S Ratio of 2.99 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PHG

1.26

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.49
Q3
5.41
Median
2.86
Q1
2.07
Min
0.74

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s P/S Ratio of 1.26 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

GMED vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GMED

1.86

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
6.56
Median
3.53
Q1
2.36
Min
0.71

GMED’s P/B Ratio of 1.86 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

PHG

1.89

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
6.56
Median
3.53
Q1
2.36
Min
0.71

PHG’s P/B Ratio of 1.89 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

GMED vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGMEDPHG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.99139.46
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.991.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.861.89
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.0114.60