Seek Returns logo

GME vs. VIK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GME and VIK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGMEVIK
Company NameGameStop Corp.Viking Holdings Ltd
CountryUnited StatesBermuda
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySpecialty RetailHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization10.07 billion USD27.91 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 13, 2002May 1, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GME and VIK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GME vs. VIK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGMEVIK
5-Day Price Return-0.27%5.48%
13-Week Price Return-35.73%41.10%
26-Week Price Return-14.84%23.94%
52-Week Price Return5.34%73.34%
Month-to-Date Return0.22%5.18%
Year-to-Date Return-28.21%40.17%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.30M3.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume12.00M3.07M
3-Month Volatility58.93%23.85%
Beta-0.691.42

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GME

4.36%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
61.19%
Q3
37.24%
Median
18.81%
Q1
8.92%
Min
-13.03%

GME’s Return on Equity of 4.36% is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

VIK

--

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

Return on Equity data for VIK is currently unavailable.

GME vs. VIK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GME

5.67%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.28%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.43%
Min
-4.54%

GME’s Net Profit Margin of 5.67% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VIK

14.20%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

VIK’s Net Profit Margin of 14.20% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GME vs. VIK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GME

0.37%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
15.84%
Median
9.34%
Q1
3.83%
Min
-8.97%

GME’s Operating Profit Margin of 0.37% is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

VIK

21.61%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.61% places VIK in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GME vs. VIK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGMEVIK
Return on Equity (TTM)4.36%--
Return on Assets (TTM)3.31%7.95%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.67%14.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)0.37%21.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.55%42.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GME

8.39

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.83
Q3
1.89
Median
1.39
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

GME’s Current Ratio of 8.39 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

VIK

0.64

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

VIK’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GME vs. VIK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GME

0.30

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.57
Median
0.64
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

GME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.30 is typical for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VIK

20.33

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 20.33, VIK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GME vs. VIK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GME

-30.63

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
35.95
Median
14.13
Q1
3.61
Min
-36.00

GME has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -30.63. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

VIK

1.28

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

VIK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.28 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GME vs. VIK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGMEVIK
Current Ratio (MRQ)8.390.64
Quick Ratio (MRQ)7.860.61
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.3020.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-30.631.28

Growth

Revenue Growth

GME vs. VIK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GME vs. VIK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GME

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.53%
Q3
2.69%
Median
1.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GME currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VIK

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GME vs. VIK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GME

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
165.81%
Q3
80.94%
Median
31.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GME has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VIK

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GME vs. VIK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGMEVIK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GME

48.64

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.56
Q3
29.15
Median
22.00
Q1
15.46
Min
7.95

At 48.64, GME’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

VIK

31.47

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

VIK’s P/E Ratio of 31.47 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GME vs. VIK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GME

2.76

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.08
Q3
2.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.48
Min
0.09

GME’s P/S Ratio of 2.76 is in the upper echelon for the Specialty Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VIK

4.47

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

VIK’s P/S Ratio of 4.47 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GME vs. VIK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GME

2.39

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.98
Median
3.69
Q1
1.79
Min
0.21

GME’s P/B Ratio of 2.39 is within the conventional range for the Specialty Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VIK

84.85

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

At 84.85, VIK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GME vs. VIK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGMEVIK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)48.6431.47
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.764.47
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.3984.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.3518.29