Seek Returns logo

GME vs. PKG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GME and PKG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGMEPKG
Company NameGameStop Corp.Packaging Corporation of America
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryMaterials
GICS IndustrySpecialty RetailContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization10.12 billion USD17.83 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 13, 2002January 28, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GME and PKG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GME vs. PKG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGMEPKG
5-Day Price Return-1.14%0.81%
13-Week Price Return-18.86%1.89%
26-Week Price Return-14.09%-6.61%
52-Week Price Return-0.13%0.56%
Month-to-Date Return0.80%2.26%
Year-to-Date Return-27.79%-12.00%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.95M0.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume12.16M0.74M
3-Month Volatility64.27%22.98%
Beta-0.660.94

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GME

4.36%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
61.19%
Q3
37.24%
Median
18.81%
Q1
8.92%
Min
-13.03%

GME’s Return on Equity of 4.36% is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

PKG

20.33%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

PKG’s Return on Equity of 20.33% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GME vs. PKG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GME

5.67%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.28%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.43%
Min
-4.54%

GME’s Net Profit Margin of 5.67% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PKG

10.47%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.47% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GME vs. PKG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GME

0.37%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
15.84%
Median
9.34%
Q1
3.83%
Min
-8.97%

GME’s Operating Profit Margin of 0.37% is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

PKG

14.39%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.39% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GME vs. PKG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGMEPKG
Return on Equity (TTM)4.36%20.33%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.31%10.16%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.67%10.47%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)0.37%14.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.55%22.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GME

8.39

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.83
Q3
1.89
Median
1.39
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

GME’s Current Ratio of 8.39 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

PKG

3.54

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

PKG’s Current Ratio of 3.54 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

GME vs. PKG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GME

0.30

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.57
Median
0.64
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

GME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.30 is typical for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PKG

0.54

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, PKG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GME vs. PKG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GME

-30.63

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
35.95
Median
14.13
Q1
3.61
Min
-36.00

GME has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -30.63. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

PKG

26.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.71, PKG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

GME vs. PKG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGMEPKG
Current Ratio (MRQ)8.393.54
Quick Ratio (MRQ)7.862.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.300.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-30.6326.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

GME vs. PKG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GME vs. PKG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GME

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.53%
Q3
2.69%
Median
1.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GME currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PKG

2.53%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GME vs. PKG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GME

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
165.81%
Q3
80.94%
Median
31.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GME has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PKG

49.67%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.67% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GME vs. PKG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGMEPKG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%49.67%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GME

48.64

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.56
Q3
29.15
Median
22.00
Q1
15.46
Min
7.95

At 48.64, GME’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

PKG

19.67

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

PKG’s P/E Ratio of 19.67 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GME vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GME

2.76

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.08
Q3
2.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.48
Min
0.09

GME’s P/S Ratio of 2.76 is in the upper echelon for the Specialty Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PKG

2.06

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

PKG’s P/S Ratio of 2.06 is in the upper echelon for the Containers & Packaging industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GME vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GME

2.39

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.98
Median
3.69
Q1
1.79
Min
0.21

GME’s P/B Ratio of 2.39 is within the conventional range for the Specialty Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PKG

3.66

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

PKG’s P/B Ratio of 3.66 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GME vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGMEPKG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)48.6419.67
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.762.06
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.393.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.3528.54