GM vs. PAG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 23, 2025

Here’s a clear look at GM and PAG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	GM	PAG
Company Name	General Motors Company	Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Automobiles	Specialty Retail
Market Capitalization	54.05 billion USD	12.03 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	November 18, 2010	October 23, 1996
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GM and PAG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GM vs. PAG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	GM	PAG
5-Day Price Return	0.62%	-0.46%
13-Week Price Return	13.47%	9.10%
26-Week Price Return	18.54%	3.60%
52-Week Price Return	24.06%	10.50%
Month-to-Date Return	6.43%	8.85%
Year-to-Date Return	6.57%	19.54%
10-Day Avg. Volume	6.28M	0.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume	9.85M	0.24M
3-Month Volatility	33.97%	28.85%
Beta	1.36	0.90

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GM

7.21%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 25.70%
Q3: 12.88%
Median: 6.92%
Q1: 0.71%
Min: -15.89%

GM’s Return on Equity of 7.21% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PAG

17.87%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 61.19%
Q3: 37.24%
Median: 18.81%
Q1: 8.92%
Min: -13.03%

PAG’s Return on Equity of 17.87% is on par with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GM vs. PAG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GM

2.54%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 9.92%
Q3: 5.78%
Median: 3.23%
Q1: 0.11%
Min: -5.31%

GM’s Net Profit Margin of 2.54% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PAG

3.13%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 21.28%
Q3: 10.68%
Median: 6.08%
Q1: 2.43%
Min: -4.54%

PAG’s Net Profit Margin of 3.13% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GM vs. PAG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GM

3.42%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 13.07%
Q3: 7.22%
Median: 5.29%
Q1: 0.43%
Min: -4.46%

GM’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.42% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PAG

4.47%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 33.35%
Q3: 15.84%
Median: 9.34%
Q1: 3.83%
Min: -8.97%

PAG’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.47% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GM vs. PAG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	GM	PAG
Return on Equity (TTM)	7.21%	17.87%
Return on Assets (TTM)	1.67%	5.62%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	2.54%	3.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	3.42%	4.47%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	10.97%	16.58%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GM

1.22

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.19
Q3: 1.54
Median: 1.26
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.48

GM’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PAG

0.90

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 2.83
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.39
Q1: 1.11
Min: 0.64

PAG’s Current Ratio of 0.90 falls into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GM vs. PAG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GM

2.05

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.34
Q3: 1.13
Median: 0.58
Q1: 0.28
Min: 0.06

GM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Automobiles industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.05. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PAG

1.07

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 3.02
Q3: 1.57
Median: 0.64
Q1: 0.20
Min: 0.00

PAG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.07 is typical for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GM vs. PAG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GM

25.00

Automobiles Industry

Max: 77.87
Q3: 42.86
Median: 13.88
Q1: 2.13
Min: -49.07

GM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 25.00 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PAG

17.12

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 48.12
Q3: 35.95
Median: 14.13
Q1: 3.61
Min: -36.00

PAG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GM vs. PAG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	GM	PAG
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.22	0.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.05	0.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.05	1.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	25.00	17.12

Growth

Revenue Growth

GM vs. PAG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GM vs. PAG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GM

1.17%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 10.71%
Q3: 5.39%
Median: 3.14%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

GM’s Dividend Yield of 1.17% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PAG

2.62%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 6.53%
Q3: 2.69%
Median: 1.08%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PAG’s Dividend Yield of 2.62% is consistent with its peers in the Specialty Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GM vs. PAG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GM

6.61%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 114.43%
Q3: 59.30%
Median: 37.15%
Q1: 16.40%
Min: 0.00%

GM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.61% is in the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

PAG

33.11%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 165.81%
Q3: 80.94%
Median: 31.61%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PAG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.11% is within the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GM vs. PAG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	GM	PAG
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.17%	2.62%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	6.61%	33.11%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GM

11.38

Automobiles Industry

Max: 27.69
Q3: 19.99
Median: 9.85
Q1: 6.60
Min: 4.25

GM’s P/E Ratio of 11.38 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PAG

12.63

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 48.56
Q3: 29.15
Median: 22.00
Q1: 15.46
Min: 7.95

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, PAG’s P/E Ratio of 12.63 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

GM vs. PAG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GM

0.29

Automobiles Industry

Max: 1.52
Q3: 0.84
Median: 0.41
Q1: 0.23
Min: 0.08

GM’s P/S Ratio of 0.29 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PAG

0.40

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 5.08
Q3: 2.69
Median: 1.23
Q1: 0.48
Min: 0.09

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, PAG’s P/S Ratio of 0.40 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

GM vs. PAG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GM

0.71

Automobiles Industry

Max: 4.25
Q3: 2.00
Median: 0.87
Q1: 0.46
Min: 0.19

GM’s P/B Ratio of 0.71 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PAG

2.03

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 16.93
Q3: 7.98
Median: 3.69
Q1: 1.79
Min: 0.21

PAG’s P/B Ratio of 2.03 is within the conventional range for the Specialty Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GM vs. PAG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	GM	PAG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	11.38	12.63
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.29	0.40
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	0.71	2.03
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	42.18	18.68