Seek Returns logo

GM vs. NVR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GM and NVR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGMNVR
Company NameGeneral Motors CompanyNVR, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization54.05 billion USD22.19 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 18, 2010July 22, 1985
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GM and NVR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GM vs. NVR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGMNVR
5-Day Price Return0.62%-2.03%
13-Week Price Return13.47%9.82%
26-Week Price Return18.54%9.41%
52-Week Price Return24.06%-9.29%
Month-to-Date Return6.43%6.39%
Year-to-Date Return6.57%-1.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.28M0.02M
3-Month Avg. Volume9.85M0.02M
3-Month Volatility33.97%29.83%
Beta1.360.95

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GM

7.21%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

GM’s Return on Equity of 7.21% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NVR

37.35%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

NVR’s Return on Equity of 37.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GM vs. NVR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GM

2.54%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

GM’s Net Profit Margin of 2.54% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NVR

14.18%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.18% places NVR in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GM vs. NVR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GM

3.42%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

GM’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.42% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NVR

18.55%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.55% places NVR in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GM vs. NVR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGMNVR
Return on Equity (TTM)7.21%37.35%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.67%24.32%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.54%14.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.42%18.55%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)10.97%25.28%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GM

1.22

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

GM’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NVR

3.36

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

NVR’s Current Ratio of 3.36 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GM vs. NVR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GM

2.05

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

GM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Automobiles industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.05. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

NVR

0.24

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

NVR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.24 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GM vs. NVR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GM

25.00

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

GM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 25.00 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NVR

77.14

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

NVR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 77.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GM vs. NVR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGMNVR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.223.36
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.051.53
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.050.24
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)25.0077.14

Growth

Revenue Growth

GM vs. NVR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GM vs. NVR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GM

1.17%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GM’s Dividend Yield of 1.17% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

NVR

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

NVR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GM vs. NVR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GM

6.61%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

GM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.61% is in the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

NVR

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

NVR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GM vs. NVR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGMNVR
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.17%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.61%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GM

11.38

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

GM’s P/E Ratio of 11.38 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NVR

15.48

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

NVR’s P/E Ratio of 15.48 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GM vs. NVR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GM

0.29

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

GM’s P/S Ratio of 0.29 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NVR

2.19

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 2.19, NVR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GM vs. NVR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GM

0.71

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

GM’s P/B Ratio of 0.71 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NVR

5.62

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

At 5.62, NVR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GM vs. NVR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGMNVR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.3815.48
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.292.19
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.715.62
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)42.1819.46