Seek Returns logo

GM vs. H: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GM and H, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

GM’s market capitalization of 51.33 billion USD is substantially larger than H’s 14.06 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.34 for GM and 1.43 for H, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolGMH
Company NameGeneral Motors CompanyHyatt Hotels Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustryAuto - ManufacturersTravel Lodging
CEOMary T. BarraMark Samuel Hoplamazian
Price53.39 USD147.34 USD
Market Cap51.33 billion USD14.06 billion USD
Beta1.341.43
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateNovember 18, 2010November 5, 2009
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GM and H by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GM vs. H: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

GM

8.71%

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
103.41%
Q3
44.32%
Median
10.17%
Q1
-11.48%
Min
-70.38%

GM’s Return on Equity of 8.71% is on par with the norm for the Auto - Manufacturers industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

H

21.82%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
54.87%
Q3
39.53%
Median
21.82%
Q1
-42.75%
Min
-92.80%

H’s Return on Equity of 21.82% is on par with the norm for the Travel Lodging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GM vs. H: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Auto - Manufacturers and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

GM

4.53%

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
35.94%
Q3
4.50%
Median
-5.87%
Q1
-40.39%
Min
-107.35%

In the upper quartile for the Auto - Manufacturers industry, GM’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.53% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

H

6.72%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
17.37%
Median
15.46%
Q1
6.72%
Min
-0.59%

H’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.72% is in line with the norm for the Travel Lodging industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

GM vs. H: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Auto - Manufacturers and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

GM

3.08%

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
22.99%
Q3
5.16%
Median
-1.71%
Q1
-78.77%
Min
-149.10%

GM’s Net Profit Margin of 3.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Auto - Manufacturers industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

H

11.98%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
19.75%
Q3
16.41%
Median
12.76%
Q1
11.98%
Min
9.75%

H’s Net Profit Margin of 11.98% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Travel Lodging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GM vs. H: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Auto - Manufacturers and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

GM

6.58%

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
29.04%
Q3
6.33%
Median
-2.21%
Q1
-66.44%
Min
-106.75%

An Operating Profit Margin of 6.58% places GM in the upper quartile for the Auto - Manufacturers industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

H

15.10%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
30.55%
Q3
21.77%
Median
21.15%
Q1
15.15%
Min
15.10%

H’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.10% is in the lower quartile for the Travel Lodging industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

GM vs. H: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Auto - Manufacturers and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGMH
Return on Equity (TTM)8.71%21.82%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.06%5.67%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.53%6.72%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.08%11.98%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.58%15.10%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)12.11%24.82%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

GM

1.21

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
3.32
Q3
1.96
Median
1.25
Q1
0.90
Min
0.38

GM’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Auto - Manufacturers industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

H

0.98

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
0.99
Q3
0.98
Median
0.96
Q1
0.83
Min
0.83

H’s Current Ratio of 0.98 aligns with the median group of the Travel Lodging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GM vs. H: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Auto - Manufacturers and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

GM

2.06

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
1.08
Q3
0.96
Median
0.80
Q1
0.46
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.06, GM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Auto - Manufacturers industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

H

1.33

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
4.37
Q3
3.27
Median
2.12
Q1
1.13
Min
0.53

H’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.33 is typical for the Travel Lodging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GM vs. H: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Auto - Manufacturers and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

GM

15.92

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
45.34
Q3
22.10
Median
2.42
Q1
-13.59
Min
-26.25

GM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Auto - Manufacturers industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

H

7.05

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
7.05
Q3
7.05
Median
5.31
Q1
4.28
Min
4.07

H’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Travel Lodging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GM vs. H: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Auto - Manufacturers and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGMH
Current Ratio (TTM)1.210.98
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.040.98
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.061.33
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.470.33
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)5.172.59
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.927.05

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for GM and H. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

GM vs. H: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

GM vs. H: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

GM vs. H: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

GM

1.18%

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
7.57%
Q3
0.92%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.18%, GM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Auto - Manufacturers industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

H

0.51%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
3.94%
Q3
1.93%
Median
0.94%
Q1
0.43%
Min
0.00%

H’s Dividend Yield of 0.51% is consistent with its peers in the Travel Lodging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GM vs. H: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Auto - Manufacturers and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

GM

10.84%

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
84.98%
Q3
20.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.84% is within the typical range for the Auto - Manufacturers industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

H

9.32%

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
114.17%
Q3
36.83%
Median
28.47%
Q1
9.43%
Min
0.00%

H’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.32% is in the lower quartile for the Travel Lodging industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

GM vs. H: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Auto - Manufacturers and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGMH
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.18%0.51%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)10.84%9.32%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

GM

9.08

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
47.41
Q3
24.64
Median
8.54
Q1
7.47
Min
4.69

GM’s P/E Ratio of 9.08 is within the middle range for the Auto - Manufacturers industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

H

17.81

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
40.59
Q3
29.79
Median
22.44
Q1
18.46
Min
2.45

In the lower quartile for the Travel Lodging industry, H’s P/E Ratio of 17.81 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

GM vs. H: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Auto - Manufacturers and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

GM

2.02

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
3.87
Q3
2.14
Median
0.53
Q1
0.13
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Auto - Manufacturers industry.

H

0.41

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.92
Median
1.46
Q1
0.89
Min
0.19

In the lower quartile for the Travel Lodging industry, H’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.41 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

GM vs. H: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Auto - Manufacturers and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

GM

0.27

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
7.43
Q3
3.80
Median
1.28
Q1
0.60
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Auto - Manufacturers industry, GM’s P/S Ratio of 0.27 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

H

2.12

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
5.59
Q3
4.22
Median
3.60
Q1
2.95
Min
1.17

In the lower quartile for the Travel Lodging industry, H’s P/S Ratio of 2.12 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

GM vs. H: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Auto - Manufacturers and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

GM

0.82

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
13.96
Q3
7.23
Median
2.02
Q1
0.91
Min
0.31

GM’s P/B Ratio of 0.82 is in the lower quartile for the Auto - Manufacturers industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

H

4.09

Travel Lodging Industry

Max
11.01
Q3
10.16
Median
6.87
Q1
3.05
Min
0.61

H’s P/B Ratio of 4.09 is within the conventional range for the Travel Lodging industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GM vs. H: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Auto - Manufacturers and Travel Lodging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGMH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)9.0817.81
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.020.41
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)0.272.12
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)0.824.09
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-17.8237.21
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)7.5415.26
EV-to-Sales (TTM)0.872.56