Seek Returns logo

GLW vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GLW and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGLWUBER
Company NameCorning IncorporatedUber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsGround Transportation
Market Capitalization69.97 billion USD191.69 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 31, 1981May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GLW and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GLW vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGLWUBER
5-Day Price Return-7.34%-2.64%
13-Week Price Return25.40%-1.06%
26-Week Price Return72.32%-0.11%
52-Week Price Return73.82%28.75%
Month-to-Date Return-7.88%-5.06%
Year-to-Date Return72.69%51.89%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.95M20.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.20M17.13M
3-Month Volatility33.43%30.03%
Beta1.151.20

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GLW

12.40%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.62%
Q3
13.32%
Median
9.23%
Q1
4.70%
Min
-3.60%

GLW’s Return on Equity of 12.40% is on par with the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER

70.61%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.31%
Q3
13.97%
Median
9.07%
Q1
6.97%
Min
1.90%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 70.61% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GLW vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GLW

9.16%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
18.22%
Q3
10.34%
Median
7.81%
Q1
3.28%
Min
-4.57%

GLW’s Net Profit Margin of 9.16% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UBER

33.54%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
33.54%
Q3
16.85%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.37%
Min
-12.12%

A Net Profit Margin of 33.54% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GLW vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GLW

13.41%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
26.64%
Q3
15.10%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-7.07%

GLW’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.41% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBER

8.72%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
24.00%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.11%
Min
-12.12%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.72% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GLW vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGLWUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)12.40%70.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.80%29.80%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.16%33.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.41%8.72%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)35.69%34.15%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GLW

1.56

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.52
Q3
3.20
Median
2.02
Q1
1.51
Min
0.33

GLW’s Current Ratio of 1.56 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.15

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.32
Median
1.02
Q1
0.74
Min
0.39

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.15 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GLW vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GLW

0.71

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.12
Q3
0.55
Median
0.33
Q1
0.10
Min
0.00

GLW’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.71. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.52
Median
0.99
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GLW vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GLW

5.09

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
114.40
Q3
51.32
Median
14.03
Q1
3.74
Min
-61.15

GLW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.09 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GLW vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGLWUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.561.15
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.001.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.710.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.09-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

GLW vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GLW vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GLW

1.41%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.16%
Q3
2.39%
Median
1.18%
Q1
0.12%
Min
0.00%

GLW’s Dividend Yield of 1.41% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.61%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.75%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GLW vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GLW

72.69%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
197.57%
Q3
87.33%
Median
36.23%
Q1
3.99%
Min
0.00%

GLW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 72.69% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
76.66%
Median
45.70%
Q1
15.53%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GLW vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGLWUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.41%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)72.69%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GLW

51.50

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
71.05
Q3
42.87
Median
27.84
Q1
19.17
Min
7.73

A P/E Ratio of 51.50 places GLW in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UBER

11.39

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.48
Q3
25.52
Median
16.81
Q1
12.10
Min
5.45

In the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s P/E Ratio of 11.39 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

GLW vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GLW

4.72

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
7.81
Q3
4.01
Median
2.09
Q1
1.25
Min
0.16

GLW’s P/S Ratio of 4.72 is in the upper echelon for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UBER

3.82

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
3.82
Q3
2.15
Median
1.37
Q1
0.81
Min
0.19

UBER’s P/S Ratio of 3.82 is in the upper echelon for the Ground Transportation industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GLW vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GLW

6.09

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
7.49
Q3
4.09
Median
2.35
Q1
1.55
Min
0.44

GLW’s P/B Ratio of 6.09 is in the upper tier for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UBER

7.26

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.11
Median
1.41
Q1
1.18
Min
0.69

At 7.26, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GLW vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGLWUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)51.5011.39
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.723.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.097.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)57.7221.89