Seek Returns logo

GLW vs. QBTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GLW and QBTS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGLWQBTS
Company NameCorning IncorporatedD-Wave Quantum Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsSoftware
Market Capitalization71.20 billion USD9.15 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 31, 1981December 11, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GLW and QBTS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GLW vs. QBTS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGLWQBTS
5-Day Price Return2.65%-10.86%
13-Week Price Return55.98%68.78%
26-Week Price Return74.16%198.79%
52-Week Price Return82.82%2,299.03%
Month-to-Date Return22.38%58.19%
Year-to-Date Return72.62%194.17%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.39M75.39M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.20M52.49M
3-Month Volatility31.18%85.77%
Beta1.151.47

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GLW

7.51%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

GLW’s Return on Equity of 7.51% is on par with the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

QBTS

--

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

Return on Equity data for QBTS is currently unavailable.

GLW vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GLW

5.77%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

GLW’s Net Profit Margin of 5.77% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

QBTS

-1,263.92%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

QBTS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1,263.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GLW vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GLW

12.06%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

GLW’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.06% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

QBTS

-353.14%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

QBTS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -353.14%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GLW vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGLWQBTS
Return on Equity (TTM)7.51%--
Return on Assets (TTM)2.92%-82.90%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.77%-1,263.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.06%-353.14%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)34.77%82.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GLW

1.50

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

GLW’s Current Ratio of 1.50 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

QBTS

20.73

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

QBTS’s Current Ratio of 20.73 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

GLW vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GLW

0.67

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

GLW’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

QBTS

0.15

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

QBTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GLW vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GLW

5.09

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

GLW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.09 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

QBTS

-46.22

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

QBTS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -46.22. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GLW vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGLWQBTS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.5020.73
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.9320.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.670.15
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.09-46.22

Growth

Revenue Growth

GLW vs. QBTS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GLW vs. QBTS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GLW

1.41%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

GLW’s Dividend Yield of 1.41% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

QBTS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

QBTS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GLW vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GLW

80.34%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

GLW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 80.34% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

QBTS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

QBTS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GLW vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGLWQBTS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.41%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)80.34%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GLW

86.07

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

At 86.07, GLW’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

QBTS

--

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

P/E Ratio data for QBTS is currently unavailable.

GLW vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GLW

4.96

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

GLW’s P/S Ratio of 4.96 is in the upper echelon for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

QBTS

393.53

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

With a P/S Ratio of 393.53, QBTS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GLW vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GLW

4.05

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

GLW’s P/B Ratio of 4.05 is in the upper tier for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

QBTS

10.68

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

QBTS’s P/B Ratio of 10.68 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GLW vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGLWQBTS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)86.07--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.96393.53
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.0510.68
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)56.35--