Seek Returns logo

GLW vs. PAYC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GLW and PAYC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGLWPAYC
Company NameCorning IncorporatedPaycom Software, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsProfessional Services
Market Capitalization71.20 billion USD12.24 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 31, 1981April 15, 2014
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GLW and PAYC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GLW vs. PAYC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGLWPAYC
5-Day Price Return2.65%-4.27%
13-Week Price Return55.98%-10.05%
26-Week Price Return74.16%-6.55%
52-Week Price Return82.82%24.04%
Month-to-Date Return22.38%-8.37%
Year-to-Date Return72.62%1.55%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.39M0.78M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.20M0.63M
3-Month Volatility31.18%29.85%
Beta1.150.89

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GLW

7.51%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

GLW’s Return on Equity of 7.51% is on par with the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PAYC

25.35%

Professional Services Industry

Max
68.01%
Q3
35.32%
Median
21.92%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-20.25%

PAYC’s Return on Equity of 25.35% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GLW vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GLW

5.77%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

GLW’s Net Profit Margin of 5.77% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PAYC

21.21%

Professional Services Industry

Max
31.75%
Q3
15.50%
Median
8.95%
Q1
4.51%
Min
0.35%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.21% places PAYC in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GLW vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GLW

12.06%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

GLW’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.06% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PAYC

28.10%

Professional Services Industry

Max
30.62%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.60%
Q1
8.60%
Min
-2.18%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.10% places PAYC in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GLW vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGLWPAYC
Return on Equity (TTM)7.51%25.35%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.92%9.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.77%21.21%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.06%28.10%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)34.77%82.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GLW

1.50

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

GLW’s Current Ratio of 1.50 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PAYC

1.30

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.75
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

PAYC’s Current Ratio of 1.30 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GLW vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GLW

0.67

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

GLW’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PAYC

0.00

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.45
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, PAYC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GLW vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GLW

5.09

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

GLW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.09 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PAYC

191.88

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.41
Median
11.64
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 191.88, PAYC demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

GLW vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGLWPAYC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.501.30
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.931.27
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.670.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.09191.88

Growth

Revenue Growth

GLW vs. PAYC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GLW vs. PAYC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GLW

1.41%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

GLW’s Dividend Yield of 1.41% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PAYC

0.71%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.52%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

PAYC’s Dividend Yield of 0.71% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GLW vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GLW

80.34%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

GLW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 80.34% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PAYC

20.52%

Professional Services Industry

Max
128.51%
Q3
69.03%
Median
47.00%
Q1
18.05%
Min
0.00%

PAYC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.52% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GLW vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGLWPAYC
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.41%0.71%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)80.34%20.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GLW

86.07

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

At 86.07, GLW’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

PAYC

28.98

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.60
Q3
33.83
Median
24.95
Q1
17.59
Min
7.96

PAYC’s P/E Ratio of 28.98 is within the middle range for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GLW vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GLW

4.96

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

GLW’s P/S Ratio of 4.96 is in the upper echelon for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PAYC

6.15

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.27
Q3
4.40
Median
2.09
Q1
0.99
Min
0.17

PAYC’s P/S Ratio of 6.15 is in the upper echelon for the Professional Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GLW vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GLW

4.05

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

GLW’s P/B Ratio of 4.05 is in the upper tier for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PAYC

7.19

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.75
Q3
9.53
Median
5.88
Q1
2.95
Min
0.59

PAYC’s P/B Ratio of 7.19 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GLW vs. PAYC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGLWPAYC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)86.0728.98
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.966.15
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.057.19
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)56.3533.95