Seek Returns logo

GLNG vs. SLB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GLNG and SLB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGLNGSLB
Company NameGolar LNG LimitedSLB N.V.
CountryBermudaUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsEnergy Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization3.85 billion USD54.57 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 15, 2003December 31, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GLNG and SLB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GLNG vs. SLB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGLNGSLB
5-Day Price Return-1.74%0.08%
13-Week Price Return-5.05%11.97%
26-Week Price Return-3.69%2.30%
52-Week Price Return10.01%-15.26%
Month-to-Date Return-6.53%2.44%
Year-to-Date Return-9.33%-3.65%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.63M13.38M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.25M16.56M
3-Month Volatility33.19%29.30%
Beta0.170.74

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GLNG

3.07%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
16.09%
Median
9.55%
Q1
5.28%
Min
-10.03%

GLNG’s Return on Equity of 3.07% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

SLB

16.84%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
29.69%
Q3
19.07%
Median
12.78%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-4.04%

SLB’s Return on Equity of 16.84% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GLNG vs. SLB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GLNG

18.31%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
43.98%
Q3
20.46%
Median
8.67%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-7.11%

GLNG’s Net Profit Margin of 18.31% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SLB

10.34%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
16.51%
Q3
8.94%
Median
5.91%
Q1
3.84%
Min
-2.81%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.34% places SLB in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GLNG vs. SLB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GLNG

18.40%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
30.55%
Median
17.92%
Q1
6.58%
Min
-25.19%

GLNG’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.40% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SLB

13.97%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
33.80%
Q3
17.55%
Median
11.05%
Q1
4.67%
Min
-1.49%

SLB’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.97% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GLNG vs. SLB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGLNGSLB
Return on Equity (TTM)3.07%16.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.32%7.23%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.31%10.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.40%13.97%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)58.32%19.75%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GLNG

1.32

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.59
Q3
1.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.85
Min
0.31

GLNG’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SLB

1.39

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
2.08
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.70

SLB’s Current Ratio of 1.39 aligns with the median group of the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GLNG vs. SLB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GLNG

1.01

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

GLNG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.01 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SLB

0.50

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.09
Q3
1.06
Median
0.48
Q1
0.33
Min
0.02

SLB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GLNG vs. SLB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GLNG

1.01

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.04
Q3
20.96
Median
7.19
Q1
2.54
Min
-19.25

In the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, GLNG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.01 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SLB

43.97

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
27.00
Median
9.96
Q1
2.52
Min
-17.36

SLB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.97 is in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

GLNG vs. SLB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGLNGSLB
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.321.39
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.321.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.010.50
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.0143.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

GLNG vs. SLB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GLNG vs. SLB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GLNG

2.63%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
11.17%
Q3
6.18%
Median
4.23%
Q1
2.56%
Min
0.00%

GLNG’s Dividend Yield of 2.63% is consistent with its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SLB

2.86%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
7.69%
Q3
4.11%
Median
2.39%
Q1
0.24%
Min
0.00%

SLB’s Dividend Yield of 2.86% is consistent with its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GLNG vs. SLB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GLNG

173.93%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
177.24%
Q3
98.32%
Median
58.16%
Q1
28.57%
Min
0.00%

GLNG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 173.93% is in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

SLB

42.94%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
169.85%
Q3
97.80%
Median
44.61%
Q1
15.01%
Min
0.00%

SLB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 42.94% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GLNG vs. SLB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGLNGSLB
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.63%2.86%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)173.93%42.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GLNG

66.13

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
38.10
Q3
21.29
Median
13.95
Q1
9.93
Min
2.48

At 66.13, GLNG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

SLB

15.00

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
26.39
Q3
20.56
Median
14.49
Q1
10.91
Min
7.44

SLB’s P/E Ratio of 15.00 is within the middle range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GLNG vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GLNG

12.11

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.81
Median
1.43
Q1
0.60
Min
0.15

With a P/S Ratio of 12.11, GLNG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SLB

1.55

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.92
Q3
1.59
Median
0.89
Q1
0.57
Min
0.20

SLB’s P/S Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the market consensus for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GLNG vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GLNG

2.18

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.41
Q1
0.94
Min
0.45

GLNG’s P/B Ratio of 2.18 is in the upper tier for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SLB

2.00

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
4.87
Q3
2.69
Median
1.77
Q1
1.14
Min
0.43

SLB’s P/B Ratio of 2.00 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GLNG vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGLNGSLB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)66.1315.00
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)12.111.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.182.00
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)143.2413.38