Seek Returns logo

GL vs. OWL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GL and OWL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGLOWL
Company NameGlobe Life Inc.Blue Owl Capital Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryInsuranceCapital Markets
Market Capitalization11.71 billion USD26.24 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 1, 1980December 14, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GL and OWL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GL vs. OWL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGLOWL
5-Day Price Return-0.23%-2.08%
13-Week Price Return15.03%-11.87%
26-Week Price Return9.53%-19.57%
52-Week Price Return36.94%-12.01%
Month-to-Date Return2.16%-8.59%
Year-to-Date Return28.20%-27.21%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.60M9.45M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.60M7.61M
3-Month Volatility26.49%34.82%
Beta0.571.13

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GL

20.50%

Insurance Industry

Max
30.96%
Q3
18.76%
Median
14.22%
Q1
10.34%
Min
1.73%

In the upper quartile for the Insurance industry, GL’s Return on Equity of 20.50% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

OWL

3.42%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
22.24%
Median
13.52%
Q1
8.61%
Min
-4.25%

OWL’s Return on Equity of 3.42% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

GL vs. OWL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GL

18.11%

Insurance Industry

Max
26.78%
Q3
14.69%
Median
9.87%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-3.51%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.11% places GL in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

OWL

2.88%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
69.91%
Q3
37.24%
Median
24.30%
Q1
13.06%
Min
-15.18%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, OWL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.88% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

GL vs. OWL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GL

24.74%

Insurance Industry

Max
34.52%
Q3
20.17%
Median
14.46%
Q1
9.62%
Min
-2.51%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

OWL

17.38%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
84.86%
Q3
47.16%
Median
32.23%
Q1
18.65%
Min
-21.87%

OWL’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.38% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

GL vs. OWL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGLOWL
Return on Equity (TTM)20.50%3.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.61%0.65%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.11%2.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)24.74%17.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)----

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GL

0.54

Insurance Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.37
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

OWL

0.88

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
1.81
Median
1.01
Q1
0.56
Min
0.04

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

GL vs. OWL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GL

0.51

Insurance Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.65
Median
0.34
Q1
0.23
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

OWL

1.38

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
2.79
Median
0.96
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

GL vs. OWL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GL

11.44

Insurance Industry

Max
43.68
Q3
21.45
Median
9.67
Q1
3.55
Min
-5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

OWL

5.03

Capital Markets Industry

Max
107.59
Q3
48.41
Median
10.85
Q1
4.56
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

GL vs. OWL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGLOWL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.540.88
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.540.83
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.511.38
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.445.03

Growth

Revenue Growth

GL vs. OWL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GL vs. OWL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GL

0.73%

Insurance Industry

Max
9.80%
Q3
5.18%
Median
3.58%
Q1
2.07%
Min
0.00%

GL’s Dividend Yield of 0.73% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

OWL

1.84%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.02%
Q3
4.54%
Median
2.55%
Q1
1.27%
Min
0.00%

OWL’s Dividend Yield of 1.84% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GL vs. OWL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GL

7.91%

Insurance Industry

Max
169.40%
Q3
85.57%
Median
53.26%
Q1
23.68%
Min
0.00%

GL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 7.91% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

OWL

610.34%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
199.38%
Q3
99.28%
Median
60.67%
Q1
32.00%
Min
0.00%

At 610.34%, OWL’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Capital Markets industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

GL vs. OWL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGLOWL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.73%1.84%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)7.91%610.34%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GL

10.78

Insurance Industry

Max
30.75
Q3
18.11
Median
12.67
Q1
9.66
Min
2.87

GL’s P/E Ratio of 10.78 is within the middle range for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

OWL

331.67

Capital Markets Industry

Max
51.69
Q3
29.42
Median
17.58
Q1
12.55
Min
5.59

At 331.67, OWL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GL vs. OWL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GL

1.95

Insurance Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
1.88
Median
1.22
Q1
0.80
Min
0.23

GL’s P/S Ratio of 1.95 is in the upper echelon for the Insurance industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

OWL

9.55

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.65
Q3
7.29
Median
4.53
Q1
2.26
Min
0.04

OWL’s P/S Ratio of 9.55 is in the upper echelon for the Capital Markets industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GL vs. OWL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GL

1.89

Insurance Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.56
Median
1.88
Q1
1.20
Min
0.17

GL’s P/B Ratio of 1.89 is within the conventional range for the Insurance industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

OWL

12.65

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.83
Q3
5.12
Median
2.66
Q1
1.19
Min
0.37

At 12.65, OWL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Capital Markets industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GL vs. OWL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGLOWL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.78331.67
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.959.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.8912.65
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.5224.01