GIS vs. UL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at GIS and UL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
GIS is a standard domestic listing, while UL trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.
| Symbol | GIS | UL |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | General Mills, Inc. | Unilever PLC |
| Country | United States | United Kingdom |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Staples |
| GICS Industry | Food Products | Personal Care Products |
| Market Capitalization | 26.59 billion USD | 153.09 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | March 25, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of GIS and UL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | GIS | UL |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | -0.84% | -0.55% |
| 13-Week Price Return | -9.32% | -1.69% |
| 26-Week Price Return | -16.05% | -3.77% |
| 52-Week Price Return | -27.19% | -5.41% |
| Month-to-Date Return | 1.53% | 1.86% |
| Year-to-Date Return | -22.02% | -1.28% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 5.05M | 2.02M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 5.35M | 2.75M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 21.67% | 13.54% |
| Beta | -0.03 | 0.11 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
GIS
24.85%
Food Products Industry
- Max
- 27.15%
- Q3
- 15.66%
- Median
- 10.47%
- Q1
- 7.82%
- Min
- -2.46%
In the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, GIS’s Return on Equity of 24.85% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
UL
29.40%
Personal Care Products Industry
- Max
- 31.59%
- Q3
- 20.42%
- Median
- 11.01%
- Q1
- 3.26%
- Min
- -18.42%
In the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, UL’s Return on Equity of 29.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
GIS
11.78%
Food Products Industry
- Max
- 18.44%
- Q3
- 9.92%
- Median
- 6.38%
- Q1
- 4.13%
- Min
- -0.92%
A Net Profit Margin of 11.78% places GIS in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
UL
9.29%
Personal Care Products Industry
- Max
- 15.12%
- Q3
- 12.06%
- Median
- 9.26%
- Q1
- 5.50%
- Min
- -0.40%
UL’s Net Profit Margin of 9.29% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
GIS
16.96%
Food Products Industry
- Max
- 24.83%
- Q3
- 14.27%
- Median
- 9.73%
- Q1
- 6.26%
- Min
- -0.10%
An Operating Profit Margin of 16.96% places GIS in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
UL
14.58%
Personal Care Products Industry
- Max
- 19.80%
- Q3
- 17.96%
- Median
- 13.14%
- Q1
- 7.58%
- Min
- -4.25%
UL’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.58% is around the midpoint for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | GIS | UL |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 24.85% | 29.40% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 7.01% | 7.13% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 11.78% | 9.29% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 16.96% | 14.58% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 34.60% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
GIS
0.67
Food Products Industry
- Max
- 3.80
- Q3
- 2.40
- Median
- 1.61
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- 0.55
GIS’s Current Ratio of 0.67 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.
UL
0.76
Personal Care Products Industry
- Max
- 4.26
- Q3
- 2.61
- Median
- 1.74
- Q1
- 1.13
- Min
- 0.76
UL’s Current Ratio of 0.76 falls into the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
GIS
1.62
Food Products Industry
- Max
- 1.87
- Q3
- 0.90
- Median
- 0.48
- Q1
- 0.24
- Min
- 0.00
GIS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.62. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.
UL
1.80
Personal Care Products Industry
- Max
- 1.13
- Q3
- 0.63
- Median
- 0.26
- Q1
- 0.04
- Min
- 0.00
With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.80, UL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Personal Care Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
GIS
6.41
Food Products Industry
- Max
- 70.39
- Q3
- 32.08
- Median
- 9.51
- Q1
- 4.55
- Min
- -1.69
GIS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.41 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
UL
22.79
Personal Care Products Industry
- Max
- 96.53
- Q3
- 59.91
- Median
- 22.25
- Q1
- 7.85
- Min
- -1.93
UL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.79 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | GIS | UL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.67 | 0.76 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 0.37 | 0.55 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 1.62 | 1.80 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 6.41 | 22.79 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
GIS
4.98%
Food Products Industry
- Max
- 7.43%
- Q3
- 4.12%
- Median
- 2.67%
- Q1
- 1.57%
- Min
- 0.00%
With a Dividend Yield of 4.98%, GIS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Food Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.
UL
3.47%
Personal Care Products Industry
- Max
- 4.08%
- Q3
- 2.46%
- Median
- 1.82%
- Q1
- 0.83%
- Min
- 0.00%
With a Dividend Yield of 3.47%, UL offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
GIS
58.33%
Food Products Industry
- Max
- 202.50%
- Q3
- 109.53%
- Median
- 67.28%
- Q1
- 39.33%
- Min
- 0.00%
GIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 58.33% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
UL
79.51%
Personal Care Products Industry
- Max
- 207.61%
- Q3
- 115.17%
- Median
- 69.37%
- Q1
- 47.71%
- Min
- 0.00%
UL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.51% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | GIS | UL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 4.98% | 3.47% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 58.33% | 79.51% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
GIS
11.70
Food Products Industry
- Max
- 35.81
- Q3
- 22.88
- Median
- 17.13
- Q1
- 13.91
- Min
- 2.77
In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, GIS’s P/E Ratio of 11.70 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.
UL
22.94
Personal Care Products Industry
- Max
- 55.49
- Q3
- 36.75
- Median
- 26.49
- Q1
- 22.40
- Min
- 11.12
UL’s P/E Ratio of 22.94 is within the middle range for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
GIS
1.38
Food Products Industry
- Max
- 3.63
- Q3
- 1.86
- Median
- 1.14
- Q1
- 0.68
- Min
- 0.12
GIS’s P/S Ratio of 1.38 aligns with the market consensus for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
UL
2.13
Personal Care Products Industry
- Max
- 5.35
- Q3
- 2.83
- Median
- 2.07
- Q1
- 1.13
- Min
- 0.00
UL’s P/S Ratio of 2.13 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
GIS
3.18
Food Products Industry
- Max
- 5.01
- Q3
- 2.76
- Median
- 1.98
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- 0.52
GIS’s P/B Ratio of 3.18 is in the upper tier for the Food Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
UL
7.06
Personal Care Products Industry
- Max
- 7.32
- Q3
- 5.26
- Median
- 2.93
- Q1
- 1.84
- Min
- 1.14
UL’s P/B Ratio of 7.06 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | GIS | UL |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 11.70 | 22.94 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 1.38 | 2.13 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 3.18 | 7.06 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 11.71 | 19.80 |