Seek Returns logo

GIS vs. SJM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GIS and SJM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGISSJM
Company NameGeneral Mills, Inc.The J. M. Smucker Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryFood ProductsFood Products
Market Capitalization26.59 billion USD12.06 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980October 31, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GIS and SJM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GIS vs. SJM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGISSJM
5-Day Price Return-0.84%1.86%
13-Week Price Return-9.32%0.45%
26-Week Price Return-16.05%9.51%
52-Week Price Return-27.19%-3.72%
Month-to-Date Return1.53%5.28%
Year-to-Date Return-22.02%2.62%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.05M1.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.35M1.76M
3-Month Volatility21.67%38.70%
Beta-0.030.24

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GIS

24.85%

Food Products Industry

Max
27.15%
Q3
15.66%
Median
10.47%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-2.46%

In the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, GIS’s Return on Equity of 24.85% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SJM

-17.34%

Food Products Industry

Max
27.15%
Q3
15.66%
Median
10.47%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-2.46%

SJM has a negative Return on Equity of -17.34%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GIS vs. SJM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GIS

11.78%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
9.92%
Median
6.38%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-0.92%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.78% places GIS in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SJM

-14.10%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
9.92%
Median
6.38%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-0.92%

SJM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -14.10%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GIS vs. SJM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GIS

16.96%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.27%
Median
9.73%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.10%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.96% places GIS in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SJM

-7.38%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.27%
Median
9.73%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.10%

SJM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -7.38%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GIS vs. SJM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGISSJM
Return on Equity (TTM)24.85%-17.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.01%-6.45%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.78%-14.10%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.96%-7.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)34.60%38.89%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GIS

0.67

Food Products Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.40
Median
1.61
Q1
1.28
Min
0.55

GIS’s Current Ratio of 0.67 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SJM

0.81

Food Products Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.40
Median
1.61
Q1
1.28
Min
0.55

SJM’s Current Ratio of 0.81 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GIS vs. SJM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GIS

1.62

Food Products Industry

Max
1.87
Q3
0.90
Median
0.48
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

GIS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.62. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SJM

1.26

Food Products Industry

Max
1.87
Q3
0.90
Median
0.48
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

SJM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.26. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GIS vs. SJM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GIS

6.41

Food Products Industry

Max
70.39
Q3
32.08
Median
9.51
Q1
4.55
Min
-1.69

GIS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.41 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SJM

-1.69

Food Products Industry

Max
70.39
Q3
32.08
Median
9.51
Q1
4.55
Min
-1.69

SJM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.69. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GIS vs. SJM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGISSJM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.670.81
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.370.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.621.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.41-1.69

Growth

Revenue Growth

GIS vs. SJM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GIS vs. SJM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GIS

4.98%

Food Products Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
4.12%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.57%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.98%, GIS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Food Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

SJM

3.80%

Food Products Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
4.12%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.57%
Min
0.00%

SJM’s Dividend Yield of 3.80% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GIS vs. SJM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GIS

58.33%

Food Products Industry

Max
202.50%
Q3
109.53%
Median
67.28%
Q1
39.33%
Min
0.00%

GIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 58.33% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SJM

59.47%

Food Products Industry

Max
202.50%
Q3
109.53%
Median
67.28%
Q1
39.33%
Min
0.00%

SJM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.47% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GIS vs. SJM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGISSJM
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.98%3.80%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)58.33%59.47%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GIS

11.70

Food Products Industry

Max
35.81
Q3
22.88
Median
17.13
Q1
13.91
Min
2.77

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, GIS’s P/E Ratio of 11.70 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SJM

--

Food Products Industry

Max
35.81
Q3
22.88
Median
17.13
Q1
13.91
Min
2.77

P/E Ratio data for SJM is currently unavailable.

GIS vs. SJM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GIS

1.38

Food Products Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.86
Median
1.14
Q1
0.68
Min
0.12

GIS’s P/S Ratio of 1.38 aligns with the market consensus for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SJM

1.37

Food Products Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.86
Median
1.14
Q1
0.68
Min
0.12

SJM’s P/S Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the market consensus for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GIS vs. SJM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GIS

3.18

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.76
Median
1.98
Q1
1.26
Min
0.52

GIS’s P/B Ratio of 3.18 is in the upper tier for the Food Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SJM

2.03

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.76
Median
1.98
Q1
1.26
Min
0.52

SJM’s P/B Ratio of 2.03 is within the conventional range for the Food Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GIS vs. SJM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGISSJM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.70--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.381.37
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.182.03
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.7114.67