Seek Returns logo

GIS vs. PG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GIS and PG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGISPG
Company NameGeneral Mills, Inc.The Procter & Gamble Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryFood ProductsHousehold Products
Market Capitalization26.83 billion USD371.66 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GIS and PG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GIS vs. PG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGISPG
5-Day Price Return1.68%1.89%
13-Week Price Return-5.96%-4.09%
26-Week Price Return-12.82%-4.09%
52-Week Price Return-28.95%-6.75%
Month-to-Date Return2.45%5.45%
Year-to-Date Return-21.31%-5.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.63M6.97M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.28M8.13M
3-Month Volatility20.85%14.70%
Beta-0.030.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GIS

24.85%

Food Products Industry

Max
27.15%
Q3
15.66%
Median
10.47%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-2.46%

In the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, GIS’s Return on Equity of 24.85% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PG

30.78%

Household Products Industry

Max
226.04%
Q3
106.83%
Median
17.55%
Q1
9.51%
Min
-8.31%

PG’s Return on Equity of 30.78% is on par with the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GIS vs. PG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GIS

11.78%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
9.92%
Median
6.38%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-0.92%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.78% places GIS in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PG

18.95%

Household Products Industry

Max
12.48%
Q3
10.54%
Median
9.15%
Q1
8.81%
Min
8.58%

PG’s Net Profit Margin of 18.95% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

GIS vs. PG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GIS

16.96%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.27%
Median
9.73%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.10%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.96% places GIS in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PG

23.32%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.54%
Q3
16.06%
Median
13.28%
Q1
12.03%
Min
6.49%

PG’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.32% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

GIS vs. PG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGISPG
Return on Equity (TTM)24.85%30.78%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.01%12.85%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.78%18.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.96%23.32%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)34.60%51.34%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GIS

0.67

Food Products Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.40
Median
1.61
Q1
1.28
Min
0.55

GIS’s Current Ratio of 0.67 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PG

0.70

Household Products Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.04
Median
1.21
Q1
0.76
Min
0.55

PG’s Current Ratio of 0.70 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GIS vs. PG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GIS

1.62

Food Products Industry

Max
1.87
Q3
0.90
Median
0.48
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

GIS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.62. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PG

0.66

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.49
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

PG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.66 is typical for the Household Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GIS vs. PG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GIS

6.41

Food Products Industry

Max
70.39
Q3
32.08
Median
9.51
Q1
4.55
Min
-1.69

GIS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.41 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PG

47.04

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
13.94
Q1
9.41
Min
4.76

PG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 47.04 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GIS vs. PG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGISPG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.670.70
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.370.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.620.66
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.4147.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

GIS vs. PG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GIS vs. PG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GIS

4.96%

Food Products Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
4.12%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.57%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.96%, GIS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Food Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

PG

2.64%

Household Products Industry

Max
5.40%
Q3
3.85%
Median
2.82%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

PG’s Dividend Yield of 2.64% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GIS vs. PG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GIS

58.33%

Food Products Industry

Max
202.50%
Q3
109.53%
Median
67.28%
Q1
39.33%
Min
0.00%

GIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 58.33% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PG

61.80%

Household Products Industry

Max
191.34%
Q3
102.63%
Median
70.63%
Q1
34.62%
Min
0.00%

PG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.80% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GIS vs. PG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGISPG
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.96%2.64%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)58.33%61.80%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GIS

11.77

Food Products Industry

Max
35.81
Q3
22.88
Median
17.13
Q1
13.91
Min
2.77

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, GIS’s P/E Ratio of 11.77 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

PG

23.40

Household Products Industry

Max
33.84
Q3
22.61
Median
18.73
Q1
14.08
Min
13.61

A P/E Ratio of 23.40 places PG in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GIS vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GIS

1.39

Food Products Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.86
Median
1.14
Q1
0.68
Min
0.12

GIS’s P/S Ratio of 1.39 aligns with the market consensus for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PG

4.43

Household Products Industry

Max
4.78
Q3
2.70
Median
1.93
Q1
1.27
Min
0.73

PG’s P/S Ratio of 4.43 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GIS vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GIS

3.18

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.76
Median
1.98
Q1
1.26
Min
0.52

GIS’s P/B Ratio of 3.18 is in the upper tier for the Food Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PG

7.14

Household Products Industry

Max
14.28
Q3
14.28
Median
4.13
Q1
1.75
Min
1.42

PG’s P/B Ratio of 7.14 is within the conventional range for the Household Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GIS vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGISPG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.7723.40
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.394.43
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.187.14
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.7826.61