Seek Returns logo

GIS vs. MDLZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GIS and MDLZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGISMDLZ
Company NameGeneral Mills, Inc.Mondelez International, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryFood ProductsFood Products
Market Capitalization27.04 billion USD81.98 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980June 13, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GIS and MDLZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GIS vs. MDLZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGISMDLZ
5-Day Price Return-1.35%-2.98%
13-Week Price Return-2.68%-7.37%
26-Week Price Return-14.64%-5.82%
52-Week Price Return-32.21%-15.81%
Month-to-Date Return2.21%1.68%
Year-to-Date Return-20.93%4.59%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.97M8.26M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.90M7.37M
3-Month Volatility20.70%21.69%
Beta-0.040.44

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GIS

31.42%

Food Products Industry

Max
30.51%
Q3
16.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-2.18%

GIS’s Return on Equity of 31.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Food Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MDLZ

13.64%

Food Products Industry

Max
30.51%
Q3
16.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-2.18%

MDLZ’s Return on Equity of 13.64% is on par with the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GIS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GIS

15.24%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
10.21%
Median
6.29%
Q1
3.53%
Min
-0.80%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.24% places GIS in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MDLZ

9.81%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
10.21%
Median
6.29%
Q1
3.53%
Min
-0.80%

MDLZ’s Net Profit Margin of 9.81% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Food Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GIS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GIS

21.92%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.29%
Median
9.64%
Q1
6.11%
Min
0.08%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.92% places GIS in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MDLZ

12.44%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.29%
Median
9.64%
Q1
6.11%
Min
0.08%

MDLZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.44% is around the midpoint for the Food Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GIS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGISMDLZ
Return on Equity (TTM)31.42%13.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.83%5.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.24%9.81%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.92%12.44%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)34.39%32.55%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GIS

0.66

Food Products Industry

Max
3.99
Q3
2.39
Median
1.62
Q1
1.23
Min
0.57

GIS’s Current Ratio of 0.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MDLZ

0.64

Food Products Industry

Max
3.99
Q3
2.39
Median
1.62
Q1
1.23
Min
0.57

MDLZ’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GIS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GIS

1.52

Food Products Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.92
Median
0.51
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

GIS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.52. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MDLZ

0.80

Food Products Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.92
Median
0.51
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

MDLZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80 is typical for the Food Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GIS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GIS

6.41

Food Products Industry

Max
65.06
Q3
29.45
Median
9.43
Q1
4.70
Min
-1.69

GIS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.41 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MDLZ

13.32

Food Products Industry

Max
65.06
Q3
29.45
Median
9.43
Q1
4.70
Min
-1.69

MDLZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.32 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GIS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGISMDLZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.660.64
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.350.39
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.520.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.4113.32

Growth

Revenue Growth

GIS vs. MDLZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GIS vs. MDLZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GIS

4.98%

Food Products Industry

Max
8.09%
Q3
4.48%
Median
2.69%
Q1
1.66%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.98%, GIS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Food Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MDLZ

3.01%

Food Products Industry

Max
8.09%
Q3
4.48%
Median
2.69%
Q1
1.66%
Min
0.00%

MDLZ’s Dividend Yield of 3.01% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GIS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GIS

45.62%

Food Products Industry

Max
216.00%
Q3
112.15%
Median
72.83%
Q1
41.56%
Min
0.00%

GIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.62% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MDLZ

66.77%

Food Products Industry

Max
216.00%
Q3
112.15%
Median
72.83%
Q1
41.56%
Min
0.00%

MDLZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 66.77% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GIS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGISMDLZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.98%3.01%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)45.62%66.77%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GIS

9.16

Food Products Industry

Max
41.70
Q3
24.61
Median
17.81
Q1
12.59
Min
3.07

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, GIS’s P/E Ratio of 9.16 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MDLZ

22.18

Food Products Industry

Max
41.70
Q3
24.61
Median
17.81
Q1
12.59
Min
3.07

MDLZ’s P/E Ratio of 22.18 is within the middle range for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GIS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GIS

1.40

Food Products Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
1.74
Median
1.10
Q1
0.66
Min
0.11

GIS’s P/S Ratio of 1.40 aligns with the market consensus for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MDLZ

2.18

Food Products Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
1.74
Median
1.10
Q1
0.66
Min
0.11

MDLZ’s P/S Ratio of 2.18 is in the upper echelon for the Food Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GIS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GIS

2.77

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.98
Median
1.93
Q1
1.28
Min
0.47

GIS’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is within the conventional range for the Food Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MDLZ

3.33

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.98
Median
1.93
Q1
1.28
Min
0.47

MDLZ’s P/B Ratio of 3.33 is in the upper tier for the Food Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GIS vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGISMDLZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)9.1622.18
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.402.18
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.773.33
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.7528.23