GIS vs. KOF: General Mills vs. Coca-Cola FEMSA Stock Comparison

Company Profile

General Mills (GIS) and Coca-Cola FEMSA (KOF) both fall under the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group, but GIS is classified in Food Products while KOF is classified in Beverages.

General Mills (GIS) trades as ordinary local shares, while Coca-Cola FEMSA (KOF) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

General Mills (GIS) reports a negative beta of -0.01, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Coca-Cola FEMSA (KOF) has a non-negative beta of 0.53.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

General Mills (GIS) reports a negative ROE of -10.50%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Coca-Cola FEMSA (KOF) reports 16.61%, ranking against industry peers normally.

General Mills (GIS) reports a negative net margin of -4.89%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Coca-Cola FEMSA (KOF) reports 7.96%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both General Mills (GIS) at 15.24% and Coca-Cola FEMSA (KOF) at 14.73% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Coca-Cola FEMSA (KOF) at 4.27% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while General Mills (GIS) at -5.45% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Both General Mills (GIS) at -103.90% and Coca-Cola FEMSA (KOF) at -87.43% post bottom-quartile EPS growth versus peers, pointing to weaker earnings momentum than typical rivals.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Coca-Cola FEMSA (KOF) at 1.14 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while General Mills (GIS) at 0.70 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for GIS.

Coca-Cola FEMSA (KOF) at 0.58 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while General Mills (GIS) at 1.82 uses more debt funding than most peers.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

General Mills (GIS) at 6.69% earns its spot in the top quartile of its industry’s yields; Coca-Cola FEMSA (KOF) at 67.45% is past the top of its own peer range — territory where a dividend-safety check matters more than the headline number.

Coca-Cola FEMSA (KOF) reports payout ratio above 100% at 501.47%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile General Mills (GIS) reports 59.41%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Coca-Cola FEMSA (KOF) trades at 139.55 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while General Mills (GIS) has no P/E ratio this period.

Coca-Cola FEMSA (KOF) at 0.08 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while General Mills (GIS) at 1.04 prices around its industry’s middle — KOF costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

On P/B ratio, both General Mills (GIS) at 2.55 and Coca-Cola FEMSA (KOF) at 2.98 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics