Seek Returns logo

GIS vs. HIMS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GIS and HIMS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGISHIMS
Company NameGeneral Mills, Inc.Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesHealth Care
GICS IndustryFood ProductsHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization27.04 billion USD13.10 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980September 13, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GIS and HIMS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GIS vs. HIMS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGISHIMS
5-Day Price Return-1.35%6.52%
13-Week Price Return-2.68%13.78%
26-Week Price Return-14.64%70.02%
52-Week Price Return-32.21%219.19%
Month-to-Date Return2.21%33.93%
Year-to-Date Return-20.93%134.57%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.97M26.13M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.90M35.44M
3-Month Volatility20.70%77.74%
Beta-0.042.25

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GIS

31.42%

Food Products Industry

Max
30.51%
Q3
16.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-2.18%

GIS’s Return on Equity of 31.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Food Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

HIMS

38.17%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

HIMS’s Return on Equity of 38.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GIS vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GIS

15.24%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
10.21%
Median
6.29%
Q1
3.53%
Min
-0.80%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.24% places GIS in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

HIMS

9.62%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.62% places HIMS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GIS vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GIS

21.92%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.29%
Median
9.64%
Q1
6.11%
Min
0.08%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.92% places GIS in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

HIMS

6.24%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

HIMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.24% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GIS vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGISHIMS
Return on Equity (TTM)31.42%38.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.83%18.98%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.24%9.62%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.92%6.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)34.39%76.20%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GIS

0.66

Food Products Industry

Max
3.99
Q3
2.39
Median
1.62
Q1
1.23
Min
0.57

GIS’s Current Ratio of 0.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HIMS

4.98

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

HIMS’s Current Ratio of 4.98 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

GIS vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GIS

1.52

Food Products Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.92
Median
0.51
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

GIS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.52. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

HIMS

1.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

HIMS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.72. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GIS vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GIS

6.41

Food Products Industry

Max
65.06
Q3
29.45
Median
9.43
Q1
4.70
Min
-1.69

GIS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.41 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HIMS

--

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

Interest Coverage Ratio data for HIMS is currently unavailable.

GIS vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGISHIMS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.664.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.354.30
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.521.72
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.41--

Growth

Revenue Growth

GIS vs. HIMS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GIS vs. HIMS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GIS

4.98%

Food Products Industry

Max
8.09%
Q3
4.48%
Median
2.69%
Q1
1.66%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.98%, GIS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Food Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GIS vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GIS

45.62%

Food Products Industry

Max
216.00%
Q3
112.15%
Median
72.83%
Q1
41.56%
Min
0.00%

GIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.62% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GIS vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGISHIMS
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.98%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)45.62%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GIS

9.16

Food Products Industry

Max
41.70
Q3
24.61
Median
17.81
Q1
12.59
Min
3.07

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, GIS’s P/E Ratio of 9.16 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

HIMS

65.74

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

At 65.74, HIMS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GIS vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GIS

1.40

Food Products Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
1.74
Median
1.10
Q1
0.66
Min
0.11

GIS’s P/S Ratio of 1.40 aligns with the market consensus for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HIMS

6.32

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 6.32, HIMS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GIS vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GIS

2.77

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.98
Median
1.93
Q1
1.28
Min
0.47

GIS’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is within the conventional range for the Food Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HIMS

19.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

At 19.83, HIMS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GIS vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGISHIMS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)9.1665.74
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.406.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.7719.83
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.7553.81