Seek Returns logo

GILD vs. TEVA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GILD and TEVA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GILD is a standard domestic listing, while TEVA trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolGILDTEVA
Company NameGilead Sciences, Inc.Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
CountryUnited StatesIsrael
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryBiotechnologyPharmaceuticals
Market Capitalization139.28 billion USD23.01 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 22, 1992February 16, 1982
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GILD and TEVA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GILD vs. TEVA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGILDTEVA
5-Day Price Return0.14%5.40%
13-Week Price Return-0.52%11.77%
26-Week Price Return-0.01%8.00%
52-Week Price Return32.57%11.38%
Month-to-Date Return0.14%4.58%
Year-to-Date Return20.33%-20.50%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.40M1.68M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.10M1.86M
3-Month Volatility28.15%28.52%
Beta0.34-0.34

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GILD

32.97%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
97.92%
Q3
11.99%
Median
-19.30%
Q1
-51.29%
Min
-132.03%

In the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, GILD’s Return on Equity of 32.97% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TEVA

-2.58%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.85%
Q1
5.40%
Min
-10.91%

TEVA has a negative Return on Equity of -2.58%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GILD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GILD

21.87%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
73.34%
Q3
18.98%
Median
-12.96%
Q1
-105.72%
Min
-259.82%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.87% places GILD in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TEVA

-0.95%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
40.67%
Q3
19.07%
Median
12.31%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-9.91%

TEVA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.95%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GILD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GILD

27.89%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
78.85%
Q3
21.90%
Median
-13.30%
Q1
-109.94%
Min
-278.10%

An Operating Profit Margin of 27.89% places GILD in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TEVA

5.38%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.78%
Q3
23.14%
Median
16.68%
Q1
7.98%
Min
-7.13%

TEVA’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.38% is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

GILD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGILDTEVA
Return on Equity (TTM)32.97%-2.58%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.19%-0.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.87%-0.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)27.89%5.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)78.53%50.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GILD

1.32

Biotechnology Industry

Max
16.97
Q3
8.39
Median
4.11
Q1
2.64
Min
0.74

GILD’s Current Ratio of 1.32 falls into the lower quartile for the Biotechnology industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TEVA

1.06

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.65
Q3
2.64
Median
1.85
Q1
1.26
Min
0.78

TEVA’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GILD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GILD

1.27

Biotechnology Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.79
Median
0.12
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

GILD’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Biotechnology industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.27. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TEVA

2.52

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.82
Median
0.35
Q1
0.13
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.52, TEVA operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Pharmaceuticals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GILD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GILD

1.71

Biotechnology Industry

Max
72.37
Q3
1.03
Median
-9.59
Q1
-65.05
Min
-163.11

GILD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 is in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

TEVA

-0.38

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
43.60
Median
9.83
Q1
2.37
Min
-42.71

TEVA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.38. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GILD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGILDTEVA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.321.06
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.890.68
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.272.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.71-0.38

Growth

Revenue Growth

GILD vs. TEVA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GILD vs. TEVA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GILD

4.23%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GILD’s Dividend Yield of 4.23% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Biotechnology industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

TEVA

0.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
3.45%
Median
2.17%
Q1
0.33%
Min
0.00%

TEVA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GILD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GILD

117.08%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 117.08%, GILD’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Biotechnology industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

TEVA

0.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
199.58%
Q3
97.17%
Median
53.47%
Q1
22.97%
Min
0.00%

TEVA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GILD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGILDTEVA
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.23%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)117.08%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GILD

22.21

Biotechnology Industry

Max
40.44
Q3
39.37
Median
22.12
Q1
15.76
Min
3.48

GILD’s P/E Ratio of 22.21 is within the middle range for the Biotechnology industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TEVA

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.19
Q3
27.91
Median
20.59
Q1
15.08
Min
3.79

P/E Ratio data for TEVA is currently unavailable.

GILD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GILD

4.86

Biotechnology Industry

Max
92.67
Q3
41.36
Median
8.45
Q1
4.46
Min
0.97

GILD’s P/S Ratio of 4.86 aligns with the market consensus for the Biotechnology industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TEVA

1.34

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
8.87
Q3
4.56
Median
2.14
Q1
1.58
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, TEVA’s P/S Ratio of 1.34 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

GILD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GILD

7.01

Biotechnology Industry

Max
22.72
Q3
10.68
Median
4.55
Q1
2.44
Min
0.59

GILD’s P/B Ratio of 7.01 is within the conventional range for the Biotechnology industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TEVA

2.87

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.99
Median
2.48
Q1
1.53
Min
0.59

TEVA’s P/B Ratio of 2.87 is within the conventional range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GILD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGILDTEVA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.21--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.861.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.012.87
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.3519.84