Seek Returns logo

GILD vs. TEM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GILD and TEM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGILDTEM
Company NameGilead Sciences, Inc.Tempus AI, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryBiotechnologyLife Sciences Tools & Services
Market Capitalization141.35 billion USD12.72 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 22, 1992June 14, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GILD and TEM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GILD vs. TEM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGILDTEM
5-Day Price Return-1.91%-4.54%
13-Week Price Return4.43%11.17%
26-Week Price Return3.61%7.55%
52-Week Price Return48.02%21.02%
Month-to-Date Return1.45%29.40%
Year-to-Date Return23.33%116.91%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.67M12.96M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.62M12.37M
3-Month Volatility29.19%79.76%
Beta0.373.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GILD

32.97%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
77.14%
Q3
10.76%
Median
-20.08%
Q1
-42.71%
Min
-119.20%

In the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, GILD’s Return on Equity of 32.97% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TEM

-107.12%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.55%
Median
6.22%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

TEM has a negative Return on Equity of -107.12%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GILD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GILD

21.87%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
59.44%
Q3
16.21%
Median
-11.49%
Q1
-167.42%
Min
-409.07%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.87% places GILD in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TEM

-20.98%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
27.28%
Q3
16.17%
Median
7.24%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-3.05%

TEM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -20.98%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GILD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GILD

27.89%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
60.62%
Q3
20.76%
Median
-12.41%
Q1
-181.14%
Min
-482.02%

An Operating Profit Margin of 27.89% places GILD in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TEM

-24.66%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
33.15%
Q3
19.34%
Median
13.02%
Q1
8.05%
Min
-4.38%

TEM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -24.66%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GILD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGILDTEM
Return on Equity (TTM)32.97%-107.12%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.19%-15.77%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.87%-20.98%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)27.89%-24.66%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)78.53%60.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GILD

1.32

Biotechnology Industry

Max
19.31
Q3
9.38
Median
4.54
Q1
2.45
Min
0.76

GILD’s Current Ratio of 1.32 falls into the lower quartile for the Biotechnology industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TEM

1.54

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.77
Median
1.85
Q1
1.40
Min
0.43

TEM’s Current Ratio of 1.54 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GILD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GILD

1.27

Biotechnology Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.64
Median
0.09
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

GILD’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Biotechnology industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.27. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TEM

2.58

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.83
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.58, TEM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GILD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GILD

1.71

Biotechnology Industry

Max
72.37
Q3
1.91
Median
-7.81
Q1
-63.90
Min
-153.80

GILD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Biotechnology industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TEM

-14.08

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
29.61
Q3
23.24
Median
6.07
Q1
2.18
Min
-14.08

TEM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -14.08. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GILD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGILDTEM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.321.54
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.891.34
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.272.58
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.71-14.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

GILD vs. TEM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GILD vs. TEM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GILD

3.98%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GILD’s Dividend Yield of 3.98% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Biotechnology industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.80%
Q3
0.78%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GILD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GILD

117.08%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 117.08%, GILD’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Biotechnology industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
156.00%
Q3
65.73%
Median
23.81%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GILD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGILDTEM
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.98%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)117.08%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GILD

23.57

Biotechnology Industry

Max
60.14
Q3
38.17
Median
29.01
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

GILD’s P/E Ratio of 23.57 is within the middle range for the Biotechnology industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TEM

--

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
117.96
Q3
65.59
Median
37.26
Q1
27.51
Min
1.73

P/E Ratio data for TEM is currently unavailable.

GILD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GILD

5.15

Biotechnology Industry

Max
76.98
Q3
36.53
Median
9.49
Q1
4.49
Min
0.00

GILD’s P/S Ratio of 5.15 aligns with the market consensus for the Biotechnology industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TEM

13.37

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
12.46
Q3
6.70
Median
4.24
Q1
2.68
Min
0.73

With a P/S Ratio of 13.37, TEM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GILD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GILD

7.01

Biotechnology Industry

Max
20.53
Q3
9.76
Median
4.77
Q1
2.49
Min
0.59

GILD’s P/B Ratio of 7.01 is within the conventional range for the Biotechnology industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TEM

35.53

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
7.99
Q3
4.69
Median
3.30
Q1
1.88
Min
1.02

At 35.53, TEM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GILD vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGILDTEM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.57--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.1513.37
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.0135.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.29--