Seek Returns logo

GILD vs. MDT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GILD and MDT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGILDMDT
Company NameGilead Sciences, Inc.Medtronic plc
CountryUnited StatesIreland
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryBiotechnologyHealth Care Equipment & Supplies
Market Capitalization140.93 billion USD126.25 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 22, 1992May 2, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GILD and MDT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GILD vs. MDT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGILDMDT
5-Day Price Return2.32%3.35%
13-Week Price Return1.61%12.27%
26-Week Price Return2.07%11.23%
52-Week Price Return34.94%12.15%
Month-to-Date Return2.32%3.35%
Year-to-Date Return22.96%23.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.43M7.68M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.20M7.61M
3-Month Volatility28.41%18.07%
Beta0.330.75

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GILD

32.97%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
97.92%
Q3
11.99%
Median
-19.30%
Q1
-51.29%
Min
-132.03%

In the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, GILD’s Return on Equity of 32.97% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MDT

9.62%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.93%
Q3
16.99%
Median
9.28%
Q1
5.10%
Min
-12.52%

MDT’s Return on Equity of 9.62% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GILD vs. MDT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GILD

21.87%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
73.34%
Q3
18.98%
Median
-12.96%
Q1
-105.72%
Min
-259.82%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.87% places GILD in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MDT

13.63%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
24.41%
Q3
13.71%
Median
10.08%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-5.58%

MDT’s Net Profit Margin of 13.63% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GILD vs. MDT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GILD

27.89%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
78.85%
Q3
21.90%
Median
-13.30%
Q1
-109.94%
Min
-278.10%

An Operating Profit Margin of 27.89% places GILD in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MDT

17.90%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
18.11%
Median
15.07%
Q1
8.48%
Min
-0.28%

MDT’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.90% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GILD vs. MDT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGILDMDT
Return on Equity (TTM)32.97%9.62%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.19%5.14%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.87%13.63%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)27.89%17.90%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)78.53%65.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GILD

1.32

Biotechnology Industry

Max
16.97
Q3
8.39
Median
4.11
Q1
2.64
Min
0.74

GILD’s Current Ratio of 1.32 falls into the lower quartile for the Biotechnology industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MDT

2.01

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.00
Median
2.13
Q1
1.44
Min
0.86

MDT’s Current Ratio of 2.01 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GILD vs. MDT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GILD

1.27

Biotechnology Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.79
Median
0.12
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

GILD’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Biotechnology industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.27. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MDT

0.60

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.61
Q3
0.76
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

MDT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GILD vs. MDT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GILD

1.71

Biotechnology Industry

Max
72.37
Q3
1.03
Median
-9.59
Q1
-65.05
Min
-163.11

GILD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 is in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MDT

10.20

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
56.35
Q3
25.56
Median
9.60
Q1
3.78
Min
-26.49

MDT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GILD vs. MDT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGILDMDT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.322.01
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.891.50
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.270.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.7110.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

GILD vs. MDT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GILD vs. MDT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GILD

4.22%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GILD’s Dividend Yield of 4.22% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Biotechnology industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

MDT

2.86%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.15%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.86%, MDT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GILD vs. MDT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GILD

117.08%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 117.08%, GILD’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Biotechnology industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

MDT

77.27%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
66.60%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MDT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 77.27% is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

GILD vs. MDT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGILDMDT
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.22%2.86%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)117.08%77.27%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GILD

22.22

Biotechnology Industry

Max
40.44
Q3
39.37
Median
22.12
Q1
15.76
Min
3.48

GILD’s P/E Ratio of 22.22 is within the middle range for the Biotechnology industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MDT

26.99

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
67.29
Q3
47.01
Median
30.94
Q1
23.91
Min
10.79

MDT’s P/E Ratio of 26.99 is within the middle range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GILD vs. MDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GILD

4.86

Biotechnology Industry

Max
92.67
Q3
41.36
Median
8.45
Q1
4.46
Min
0.97

GILD’s P/S Ratio of 4.86 aligns with the market consensus for the Biotechnology industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MDT

3.68

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.49
Q3
5.41
Median
2.86
Q1
2.07
Min
0.74

MDT’s P/S Ratio of 3.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GILD vs. MDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GILD

7.01

Biotechnology Industry

Max
22.72
Q3
10.68
Median
4.55
Q1
2.44
Min
0.59

GILD’s P/B Ratio of 7.01 is within the conventional range for the Biotechnology industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MDT

2.49

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
6.56
Median
3.53
Q1
2.36
Min
0.71

MDT’s P/B Ratio of 2.49 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GILD vs. MDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGILDMDT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.2226.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.863.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.012.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.3523.72