Seek Returns logo

GILD vs. LH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GILD and LH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGILDLH
Company NameGilead Sciences, Inc.Labcorp Holdings Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryBiotechnologyHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization149.07 billion USD22.65 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 22, 1992March 29, 1990
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GILD and LH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GILD vs. LH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGILDLH
5-Day Price Return8.94%4.84%
13-Week Price Return15.72%8.61%
26-Week Price Return22.54%10.01%
52-Week Price Return64.60%22.03%
Month-to-Date Return6.99%4.79%
Year-to-Date Return30.06%18.85%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.34M0.55M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.21M0.79M
3-Month Volatility34.21%24.23%
Beta0.370.90

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GILD

32.97%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
77.14%
Q3
10.76%
Median
-20.08%
Q1
-42.71%
Min
-119.20%

In the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, GILD’s Return on Equity of 32.97% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LH

9.25%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

LH’s Return on Equity of 9.25% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GILD vs. LH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GILD

21.87%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
59.44%
Q3
16.21%
Median
-11.49%
Q1
-167.42%
Min
-409.07%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.87% places GILD in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LH

5.66%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

LH’s Net Profit Margin of 5.66% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GILD vs. LH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GILD

27.89%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
60.62%
Q3
20.76%
Median
-12.41%
Q1
-181.14%
Min
-482.02%

An Operating Profit Margin of 27.89% places GILD in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LH

8.83%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

LH’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.83% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GILD vs. LH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGILDLH
Return on Equity (TTM)32.97%9.25%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.19%4.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.87%5.66%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)27.89%8.83%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)78.53%28.14%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GILD

1.32

Biotechnology Industry

Max
19.31
Q3
9.38
Median
4.54
Q1
2.45
Min
0.76

GILD’s Current Ratio of 1.32 falls into the lower quartile for the Biotechnology industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LH

1.50

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

LH’s Current Ratio of 1.50 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GILD vs. LH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GILD

1.27

Biotechnology Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.64
Median
0.09
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

GILD’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Biotechnology industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.27. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LH

0.67

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

LH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GILD vs. LH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GILD

1.71

Biotechnology Industry

Max
72.37
Q3
1.91
Median
-7.81
Q1
-63.90
Min
-153.80

GILD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Biotechnology industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LH

5.73

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

LH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GILD vs. LH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGILDLH
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.321.50
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.891.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.270.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.715.73

Growth

Revenue Growth

GILD vs. LH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GILD vs. LH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GILD

3.97%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GILD’s Dividend Yield of 3.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Biotechnology industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

LH

1.07%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LH’s Dividend Yield of 1.07% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GILD vs. LH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GILD

117.08%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 117.08%, GILD’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Biotechnology industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

LH

31.71%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.71% is within the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GILD vs. LH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGILDLH
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.97%1.07%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)117.08%31.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GILD

23.61

Biotechnology Industry

Max
60.14
Q3
38.17
Median
29.01
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

GILD’s P/E Ratio of 23.61 is within the middle range for the Biotechnology industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LH

29.67

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

LH’s P/E Ratio of 29.67 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GILD vs. LH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GILD

5.16

Biotechnology Industry

Max
76.98
Q3
36.53
Median
9.49
Q1
4.49
Min
0.00

GILD’s P/S Ratio of 5.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Biotechnology industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LH

1.68

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

LH’s P/S Ratio of 1.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GILD vs. LH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GILD

7.01

Biotechnology Industry

Max
20.53
Q3
9.76
Median
4.77
Q1
2.49
Min
0.59

GILD’s P/B Ratio of 7.01 is within the conventional range for the Biotechnology industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LH

2.59

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

LH’s P/B Ratio of 2.59 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GILD vs. LH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGILDLH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.6129.67
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.161.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.012.59
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.3116.54