Seek Returns logo

GIB vs. SONY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GIB and SONY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GIB is a standard domestic listing, while SONY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolGIBSONY
Company NameCGI Inc.Sony Group Corporation
CountryCanadaJapan
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryIT ServicesHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization21.50 billion USD168.52 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 7, 1998February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GIB and SONY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GIB vs. SONY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGIBSONY
5-Day Price Return3.19%0.92%
13-Week Price Return-9.43%15.46%
26-Week Price Return-21.24%19.67%
52-Week Price Return-9.31%13.72%
Month-to-Date Return0.37%13.20%
Year-to-Date Return-14.75%23.72%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.46M18.73M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.42M14.80M
3-Month Volatility15.89%31.61%
Beta0.611.33

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GIB

17.27%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, GIB’s Return on Equity of 17.27% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SONY

14.17%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

SONY’s Return on Equity of 14.17% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GIB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GIB

11.01%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

GIB’s Net Profit Margin of 11.01% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SONY

9.13%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.13% places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GIB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GIB

14.90%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.90% places GIB in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SONY

11.68%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

SONY’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.68% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GIB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGIBSONY
Return on Equity (TTM)17.27%14.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.45%3.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.01%9.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.90%11.68%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)16.35%31.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GIB

1.27

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

GIB’s Current Ratio of 1.27 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SONY

1.09

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

SONY’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GIB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GIB

0.42

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

GIB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SONY

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

SONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GIB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GIB

11.09

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

GIB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.09 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SONY

104.18

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SONY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 104.18 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

GIB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGIBSONY
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.271.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.891.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.420.19
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.09104.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

GIB vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GIB vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GIB

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GIB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SONY

0.47%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Yield of 0.47% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GIB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GIB

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GIB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SONY

10.52%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.52% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GIB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGIBSONY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%10.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GIB

17.00

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GIB’s P/E Ratio of 17.00 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SONY

22.21

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 22.21 places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GIB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GIB

1.87

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

GIB’s P/S Ratio of 1.87 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SONY

2.03

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

SONY’s P/S Ratio of 2.03 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GIB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GIB

3.14

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

GIB’s P/B Ratio of 3.14 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SONY

2.77

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

SONY’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Household Durables industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GIB vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGIBSONY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)17.0022.21
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.872.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.142.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.9012.66