Seek Returns logo

GIB vs. KLAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GIB and KLAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGIBKLAC
Company NameCGI Inc.KLA Corporation
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryIT ServicesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization19.43 billion USD149.46 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 7, 1998October 8, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GIB and KLAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GIB vs. KLAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGIBKLAC
5-Day Price Return1.31%-6.87%
13-Week Price Return-6.03%29.65%
26-Week Price Return-19.36%42.52%
52-Week Price Return-19.10%75.99%
Month-to-Date Return-0.25%-6.16%
Year-to-Date Return-22.58%80.02%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.59M1.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.49M1.01M
3-Month Volatility24.26%42.14%
Beta0.671.46

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GIB

16.37%

IT Services Industry

Max
37.08%
Q3
19.28%
Median
14.70%
Q1
6.70%
Min
-8.16%

GIB’s Return on Equity of 16.37% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KLAC

98.15%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
49.05%
Q3
22.19%
Median
7.96%
Q1
0.99%
Min
-15.65%

KLAC’s Return on Equity of 98.15% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GIB vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GIB

10.42%

IT Services Industry

Max
17.01%
Q3
11.02%
Median
6.91%
Q1
3.07%
Min
-5.13%

GIB’s Net Profit Margin of 10.42% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

KLAC

33.83%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
24.47%
Median
11.88%
Q1
0.60%
Min
-25.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 33.83% places KLAC in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GIB vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GIB

14.09%

IT Services Industry

Max
23.01%
Q3
15.32%
Median
9.57%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.58%

GIB’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.09% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KLAC

39.86%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.76%
Median
12.14%
Q1
3.29%
Min
-32.60%

An Operating Profit Margin of 39.86% places KLAC in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GIB vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGIBKLAC
Return on Equity (TTM)16.37%98.15%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.80%27.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.42%33.83%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.09%39.86%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)16.41%61.99%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GIB

0.99

IT Services Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.91
Median
1.36
Q1
1.02
Min
0.49

GIB’s Current Ratio of 0.99 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

KLAC

2.69

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.57
Q3
4.28
Median
2.86
Q1
2.22
Min
1.02

KLAC’s Current Ratio of 2.69 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GIB vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GIB

0.42

IT Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.30
Median
0.55
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

GIB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KLAC

1.18

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.18
Q3
0.48
Median
0.24
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

KLAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.18. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GIB vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GIB

11.09

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
1.68
Min
-28.15

GIB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.09 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KLAC

38.22

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.21
Median
22.37
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

KLAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.22 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GIB vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGIBKLAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.992.69
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.681.85
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.421.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.0938.22

Growth

Revenue Growth

GIB vs. KLAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GIB vs. KLAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GIB

0.51%

IT Services Industry

Max
4.66%
Q3
2.02%
Median
0.66%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GIB’s Dividend Yield of 0.51% is consistent with its peers in the IT Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KLAC

0.65%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.58%
Q3
1.59%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KLAC’s Dividend Yield of 0.65% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GIB vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GIB

8.14%

IT Services Industry

Max
93.78%
Q3
63.22%
Median
24.64%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GIB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 8.14% is within the typical range for the IT Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KLAC

22.67%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
211.90%
Q3
88.01%
Median
25.84%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KLAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.67% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GIB vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGIBKLAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.51%0.65%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)8.14%22.67%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GIB

15.93

IT Services Industry

Max
45.03
Q3
30.25
Median
21.01
Q1
16.50
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GIB’s P/E Ratio of 15.93 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

KLAC

34.88

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
95.58
Q3
58.67
Median
34.77
Q1
25.45
Min
12.63

KLAC’s P/E Ratio of 34.88 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GIB vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GIB

1.66

IT Services Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.01
Median
2.18
Q1
1.08
Min
0.00

GIB’s P/S Ratio of 1.66 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KLAC

11.80

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
18.34
Q3
10.38
Median
5.38
Q1
2.49
Min
0.32

KLAC’s P/S Ratio of 11.80 is in the upper echelon for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GIB vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GIB

2.66

IT Services Industry

Max
9.42
Q3
5.79
Median
3.70
Q1
2.30
Min
0.79

GIB’s P/B Ratio of 2.66 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KLAC

28.49

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.22
Q3
8.33
Median
4.39
Q1
1.79
Min
0.30

At 28.49, KLAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GIB vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGIBKLAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.9334.88
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.6611.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.6628.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.1638.16