Seek Returns logo

GH vs. TEVA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GH and TEVA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GH is a standard domestic listing, while TEVA trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolGHTEVA
Company NameGuardant Health, Inc.Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
CountryUnited StatesIsrael
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesPharmaceuticals
Market Capitalization7.30 billion USD19.74 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 4, 2018February 16, 1982
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GH and TEVA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GH vs. TEVA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGHTEVA
5-Day Price Return16.23%3.13%
13-Week Price Return40.59%-9.84%
26-Week Price Return27.08%-7.31%
52-Week Price Return92.22%-11.55%
Month-to-Date Return42.92%2.48%
Year-to-Date Return91.72%-29.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.09M4.12M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.42M2.25M
3-Month Volatility54.49%22.41%
Beta1.57-0.19

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GH

-246.60%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

GH has a negative Return on Equity of -246.60%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

TEVA

-2.58%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.90%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.96%

TEVA has a negative Return on Equity of -2.58%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GH vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GH

-49.93%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

GH has a negative Net Profit Margin of -49.93%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

TEVA

-0.95%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
34.51%
Q3
17.73%
Median
12.12%
Q1
5.99%
Min
-7.73%

TEVA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.95%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GH vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GH

-54.54%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

GH has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -54.54%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

TEVA

5.38%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
41.53%
Q3
23.00%
Median
16.24%
Q1
9.24%
Min
-6.94%

TEVA’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.38% is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

GH vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGHTEVA
Return on Equity (TTM)-246.60%-2.58%
Return on Assets (TTM)-29.04%-0.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-49.93%-0.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-54.54%5.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)62.84%50.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GH

3.71

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

GH’s Current Ratio of 3.71 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

TEVA

1.06

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.77
Median
1.74
Q1
1.26
Min
0.11

TEVA’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GH vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GH

16.78

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 16.78, GH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Health Care Providers & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

TEVA

2.52

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
2.44
Q3
1.07
Median
0.42
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.52, TEVA operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Pharmaceuticals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GH vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GH

-150.95

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

GH has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -150.95. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

TEVA

-0.38

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
44.18
Median
9.83
Q1
2.82
Min
-42.71

TEVA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.38. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GH vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGHTEVA
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.711.06
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.190.68
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)16.782.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-150.95-0.38

Growth

Revenue Growth

GH vs. TEVA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GH vs. TEVA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GH

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TEVA

0.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.98%
Q3
3.32%
Median
2.13%
Q1
0.14%
Min
0.00%

TEVA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GH vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GH

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TEVA

0.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
165.20%
Q3
90.59%
Median
49.13%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

TEVA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GH vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGHTEVA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GH

--

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for GH is currently unavailable.

TEVA

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
42.51
Q3
26.88
Median
19.11
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for TEVA is currently unavailable.

GH vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GH

8.75

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 8.75, GH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TEVA

1.14

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.54
Median
2.11
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, TEVA’s P/S Ratio of 1.14 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

GH vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GH

35.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

At 35.72, GH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TEVA

2.82

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.96
Median
2.23
Q1
1.46
Min
0.60

TEVA’s P/B Ratio of 2.82 is within the conventional range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GH vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGHTEVA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.751.14
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)35.722.82
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--16.95