Seek Returns logo

GH vs. MDT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GH and MDT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGHMDT
Company NameGuardant Health, Inc.Medtronic plc
CountryUnited StatesIreland
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesHealth Care Equipment & Supplies
Market Capitalization7.81 billion USD121.61 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 4, 2018May 2, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GH and MDT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GH vs. MDT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGHMDT
5-Day Price Return8.34%-0.52%
13-Week Price Return20.06%9.26%
26-Week Price Return36.30%7.95%
52-Week Price Return173.08%6.63%
Month-to-Date Return-7.33%2.62%
Year-to-Date Return104.52%19.23%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.76M8.43M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.46M7.69M
3-Month Volatility53.22%17.95%
Beta1.570.80

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GH

-246.60%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

GH has a negative Return on Equity of -246.60%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MDT

9.62%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.93%
Q3
16.99%
Median
9.28%
Q1
5.10%
Min
-12.52%

MDT’s Return on Equity of 9.62% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GH vs. MDT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GH

-49.93%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

GH has a negative Net Profit Margin of -49.93%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MDT

13.63%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
24.41%
Q3
13.71%
Median
10.08%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-5.58%

MDT’s Net Profit Margin of 13.63% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GH vs. MDT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GH

-54.54%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

GH has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -54.54%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MDT

17.90%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
18.11%
Median
15.07%
Q1
8.48%
Min
-0.28%

MDT’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.90% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GH vs. MDT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGHMDT
Return on Equity (TTM)-246.60%9.62%
Return on Assets (TTM)-29.04%5.16%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-49.93%13.63%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-54.54%17.90%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)62.84%65.40%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GH

3.71

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

GH’s Current Ratio of 3.71 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MDT

1.85

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.00
Median
2.13
Q1
1.44
Min
0.86

MDT’s Current Ratio of 1.85 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GH vs. MDT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GH

16.78

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 16.78, GH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Health Care Providers & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MDT

0.59

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.61
Q3
0.76
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

MDT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GH vs. MDT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GH

-150.95

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

GH has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -150.95. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MDT

10.20

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
56.35
Q3
25.56
Median
9.60
Q1
3.78
Min
-26.49

MDT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GH vs. MDT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGHMDT
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.711.85
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.191.42
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)16.780.59
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-150.9510.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

GH vs. MDT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GH vs. MDT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GH

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MDT

2.95%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.15%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.95%, MDT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GH vs. MDT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GH

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MDT

77.27%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
66.60%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MDT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 77.27% is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

GH vs. MDT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGHMDT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.95%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%77.27%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GH

--

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

P/E Ratio data for GH is currently unavailable.

MDT

26.23

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
67.29
Q3
47.01
Median
30.94
Q1
23.91
Min
10.79

MDT’s P/E Ratio of 26.23 is within the middle range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GH vs. MDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GH

9.44

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 9.44, GH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MDT

3.57

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.49
Q3
5.41
Median
2.86
Q1
2.07
Min
0.74

MDT’s P/S Ratio of 3.57 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GH vs. MDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GH

35.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

At 35.72, GH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MDT

2.25

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
6.56
Median
3.53
Q1
2.36
Min
0.71

MDT’s P/B Ratio of 2.25 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

GH vs. MDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGHMDT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--26.23
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.443.57
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)35.722.25
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--23.05