Seek Returns logo

GH vs. IRTC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GH and IRTC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGHIRTC
Company NameGuardant Health, Inc.iRhythm Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesHealth Care Equipment & Supplies
Market Capitalization7.30 billion USD5.24 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 4, 2018October 20, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GH and IRTC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GH vs. IRTC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGHIRTC
5-Day Price Return-3.08%0.68%
13-Week Price Return45.38%15.11%
26-Week Price Return24.52%45.47%
52-Week Price Return106.13%134.21%
Month-to-Date Return42.75%16.42%
Year-to-Date Return91.49%80.99%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.41M0.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.44M0.50M
3-Month Volatility54.92%45.48%
Beta1.531.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GH

-246.60%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

GH has a negative Return on Equity of -246.60%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

IRTC

-104.74%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

IRTC has a negative Return on Equity of -104.74%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GH vs. IRTC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GH

-49.93%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

GH has a negative Net Profit Margin of -49.93%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

IRTC

-14.06%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

IRTC has a negative Net Profit Margin of -14.06%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GH vs. IRTC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GH

-54.54%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

GH has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -54.54%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

IRTC

-16.08%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

IRTC has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -16.08%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GH vs. IRTC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGHIRTC
Return on Equity (TTM)-246.60%-104.74%
Return on Assets (TTM)-29.04%-9.91%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-49.93%-14.06%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-54.54%-16.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)62.84%69.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GH

3.71

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

GH’s Current Ratio of 3.71 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

IRTC

5.02

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

IRTC’s Current Ratio of 5.02 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

GH vs. IRTC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GH

16.78

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 16.78, GH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Health Care Providers & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

IRTC

6.25

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 6.25, IRTC operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GH vs. IRTC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GH

-150.95

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

GH has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -150.95. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

IRTC

-32.60

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

IRTC has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -32.60. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GH vs. IRTC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGHIRTC
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.715.02
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.194.75
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)16.786.25
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-150.95-32.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

GH vs. IRTC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GH vs. IRTC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GH

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IRTC

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IRTC currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GH vs. IRTC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GH

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IRTC

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IRTC has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GH vs. IRTC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGHIRTC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GH

--

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for GH is currently unavailable.

IRTC

--

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

P/E Ratio data for IRTC is currently unavailable.

GH vs. IRTC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GH

8.74

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 8.74, GH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

IRTC

7.95

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

IRTC’s P/S Ratio of 7.95 is in the upper echelon for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GH vs. IRTC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GH

35.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

At 35.72, GH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

IRTC

47.42

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

At 47.42, IRTC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GH vs. IRTC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGHIRTC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.747.95
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)35.7247.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--173.03