Seek Returns logo

GH vs. HLN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GH and HLN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GH is a standard domestic listing, while HLN trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolGHHLN
Company NameGuardant Health, Inc.Haleon plc
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorHealth CareConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesPersonal Care Products
Market Capitalization7.84 billion USD40.19 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 4, 2018July 25, 2022
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GH and HLN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GH vs. HLN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGHHLN
5-Day Price Return1.37%-0.09%
13-Week Price Return24.44%-11.63%
26-Week Price Return47.51%-15.44%
52-Week Price Return181.04%-14.72%
Month-to-Date Return0.58%-0.81%
Year-to-Date Return105.70%-12.64%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.64M19.59M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.47M14.98M
3-Month Volatility53.01%19.31%
Beta1.590.46

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GH

-246.60%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

GH has a negative Return on Equity of -246.60%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

HLN

3.26%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
33.29%
Q3
19.04%
Median
10.69%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-10.45%

HLN’s Return on Equity of 3.26% is on par with the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GH vs. HLN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GH

-49.93%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

GH has a negative Net Profit Margin of -49.93%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

HLN

12.84%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
10.84%
Median
9.29%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-0.14%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.84% places HLN in the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GH vs. HLN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GH

-54.54%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

GH has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -54.54%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

HLN

19.64%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.64%
Q3
16.46%
Median
12.80%
Q1
8.01%
Min
2.98%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.64% places HLN in the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GH vs. HLN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGHHLN
Return on Equity (TTM)-246.60%3.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)-29.04%1.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-49.93%12.84%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-54.54%19.64%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)62.84%60.75%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GH

3.71

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

GH’s Current Ratio of 3.71 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

HLN

0.87

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.73
Median
1.76
Q1
1.16
Min
0.76

HLN’s Current Ratio of 0.87 falls into the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GH vs. HLN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GH

16.78

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 16.78, GH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Health Care Providers & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

HLN

0.53

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.80
Q3
0.78
Median
0.30
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

HLN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 is typical for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GH vs. HLN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GH

-150.95

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

GH has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -150.95. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

HLN

8.00

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-3.28

HLN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.00 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GH vs. HLN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGHHLN
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.710.87
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.190.63
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)16.780.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-150.958.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

GH vs. HLN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GH vs. HLN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GH

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HLN

0.72%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
2.70%
Median
1.98%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

HLN’s Dividend Yield of 0.72% is in the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

GH vs. HLN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GH

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HLN

954.40%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
221.40%
Q3
137.27%
Median
70.48%
Q1
51.10%
Min
0.00%

At 954.40%, HLN’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

GH vs. HLN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGHHLN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.72%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%954.40%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GH

--

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

P/E Ratio data for GH is currently unavailable.

HLN

20.36

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
46.28
Q3
31.71
Median
22.50
Q1
20.20
Min
11.79

HLN’s P/E Ratio of 20.36 is within the middle range for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GH vs. HLN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GH

9.50

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 9.50, GH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

HLN

2.61

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
2.59
Q3
2.35
Median
1.92
Q1
1.18
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 2.61, HLN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Personal Care Products industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GH vs. HLN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GH

35.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

At 35.72, GH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HLN

2.11

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
12.00
Q3
6.22
Median
2.84
Q1
1.70
Min
1.12

HLN’s P/B Ratio of 2.11 is within the conventional range for the Personal Care Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GH vs. HLN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGHHLN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--20.36
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.502.61
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)35.722.11
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--13.65