Seek Returns logo

GGG vs. PAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GGG and PAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GGG is a standard domestic listing, while PAC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolGGGPAC
Company NameGraco Inc.Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
CountryUnited StatesMexico
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryTransportation Infrastructure
Market Capitalization13.84 billion USD11.66 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980February 27, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GGG and PAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GGG vs. PAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGGGPAC
5-Day Price Return-1.56%-1.30%
13-Week Price Return-5.55%-0.75%
26-Week Price Return4.14%9.88%
52-Week Price Return-2.63%29.81%
Month-to-Date Return-1.67%-2.23%
Year-to-Date Return-0.89%15.47%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.57M0.79M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.70M0.69M
3-Month Volatility17.71%22.05%
Beta1.101.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GGG

19.16%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

GGG’s Return on Equity of 19.16% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PAC

42.80%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
15.14%
Median
10.37%
Q1
6.63%
Min
1.67%

PAC’s Return on Equity of 42.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GGG

22.26%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

GGG’s Net Profit Margin of 22.26% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Machinery industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

PAC

23.19%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
56.87%
Q3
32.94%
Median
20.37%
Q1
11.21%
Min
1.22%

PAC’s Net Profit Margin of 23.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GGG

26.63%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.63% places GGG in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PAC

42.29%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
60.60%
Q3
46.73%
Median
31.03%
Q1
15.90%
Min
1.18%

PAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 42.29% is around the midpoint for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGGGPAC
Return on Equity (TTM)19.16%42.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)15.86%11.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)22.26%23.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.63%42.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.25%100.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GGG

3.55

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

GGG’s Current Ratio of 3.55 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Machinery industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

PAC

0.93

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.90
Q3
1.82
Median
1.16
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

PAC’s Current Ratio of 0.93 falls into the lower quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GGG

0.01

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, GGG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.01 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PAC

2.48

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.23
Q3
1.64
Median
0.83
Q1
0.27
Min
0.04

PAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.48. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GGG

209.37

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 209.37, GGG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Machinery industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

PAC

5.20

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
29.26
Q3
20.45
Median
7.97
Q1
4.97
Min
2.01

PAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGGGPAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.550.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.520.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.012.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)209.375.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

GGG vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GGG vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GGG

1.29%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

GGG’s Dividend Yield of 1.29% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PAC

2.55%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.64%
Q3
4.96%
Median
2.38%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.55% is consistent with its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GGG

36.94%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

GGG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.94% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PAC

71.16%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
206.16%
Q3
111.39%
Median
71.16%
Q1
37.58%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.16% is within the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGGGPAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.29%2.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)36.94%71.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GGG

28.71

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

GGG’s P/E Ratio of 28.71 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PAC

19.58

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
33.87
Q3
28.56
Median
17.26
Q1
11.95
Min
6.33

PAC’s P/E Ratio of 19.58 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GGG

6.39

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 6.39, GGG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Machinery industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PAC

4.54

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
10.89
Q3
5.40
Median
3.20
Q1
1.62
Min
0.87

PAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.54 aligns with the market consensus for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GGG

5.76

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

GGG’s P/B Ratio of 5.76 is in the upper tier for the Machinery industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PAC

9.90

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.74
Q3
3.00
Median
1.96
Q1
1.22
Min
0.38

At 9.90, PAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGGGPAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.7119.58
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.394.54
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.769.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.7818.06