GGG vs. PAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 29, 2025

Here’s a clear look at GGG and PAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GGG is a standard domestic listing, while PAC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	GGG	PAC
Company Name	Graco Inc.	Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
Country	United States	Mexico
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Machinery	Transportation Infrastructure
Market Capitalization	14.42 billion USD	12.28 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	February 27, 2006
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GGG and PAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GGG vs. PAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	GGG	PAC
5-Day Price Return	2.76%	-4.05%
13-Week Price Return	2.45%	1.58%
26-Week Price Return	1.13%	8.22%
52-Week Price Return	5.92%	44.78%
Month-to-Date Return	3.62%	4.02%
Year-to-Date Return	3.24%	22.99%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.67M	0.64M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.77M	0.69M
3-Month Volatility	18.93%	21.02%
Beta	1.08	1.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GGG

19.16%

Machinery Industry

Max: 34.68%
Q3: 19.06%
Median: 13.13%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -4.87%

In the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, GGG’s Return on Equity of 19.16% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PAC

42.80%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 26.85%
Q3: 15.47%
Median: 10.39%
Q1: 7.70%
Min: 0.79%

PAC’s Return on Equity of 42.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GGG

22.26%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.74%
Q3: 11.24%
Median: 8.13%
Q1: 5.38%
Min: -1.11%

GGG’s Net Profit Margin of 22.26% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Machinery industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

PAC

23.19%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 49.26%
Q3: 27.75%
Median: 17.98%
Q1: 10.18%
Min: 4.19%

PAC’s Net Profit Margin of 23.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GGG

26.63%

Machinery Industry

Max: 26.63%
Q3: 16.15%
Median: 11.27%
Q1: 7.72%
Min: -4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.63% places GGG in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PAC

42.29%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 60.91%
Q3: 43.57%
Median: 30.58%
Q1: 16.77%
Min: 1.18%

PAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 42.29% is around the midpoint for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	GGG	PAC
Return on Equity (TTM)	19.16%	42.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)	15.86%	11.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	22.26%	23.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	26.63%	42.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	52.25%	100.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GGG

3.55

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.83
Q3: 2.32
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.28
Min: 0.78

GGG’s Current Ratio of 3.55 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PAC

0.93

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 3.35
Q3: 1.90
Median: 1.35
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.28

PAC’s Current Ratio of 0.93 aligns with the median group of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GGG

0.01

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.49
Q3: 0.75
Median: 0.44
Q1: 0.26
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, GGG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.01 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PAC

2.48

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 3.70
Q3: 1.70
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.04

PAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.48. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GGG

209.37

Machinery Industry

Max: 67.55
Q3: 33.79
Median: 13.87
Q1: 7.97
Min: -1.43

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 209.37, GGG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Machinery industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

PAC

5.20

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 29.26
Q3: 20.33
Median: 8.92
Q1: 5.22
Min: 2.01

In the lower quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, PAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.20 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	GGG	PAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)	3.55	0.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	2.52	0.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.01	2.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	209.37	5.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

GGG vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GGG vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GGG

1.26%

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.32%
Q3: 2.84%
Median: 1.87%
Q1: 1.09%
Min: 0.00%

GGG’s Dividend Yield of 1.26% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PAC

2.53%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 7.48%
Q3: 3.76%
Median: 2.40%
Q1: 1.13%
Min: 0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GGG

36.94%

Machinery Industry

Max: 202.17%
Q3: 98.65%
Median: 55.54%
Q1: 29.03%
Min: 0.00%

GGG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.94% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PAC

71.16%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 197.82%
Q3: 109.11%
Median: 70.69%
Q1: 33.40%
Min: 0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.16% is within the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	GGG	PAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.26%	2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	36.94%	71.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GGG

29.39

Machinery Industry

Max: 53.66
Q3: 31.29
Median: 22.00
Q1: 16.18
Min: 7.00

GGG’s P/E Ratio of 29.39 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PAC

19.76

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 35.90
Q3: 21.76
Median: 17.41
Q1: 12.31
Min: 5.46

PAC’s P/E Ratio of 19.76 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GGG

6.54

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.04
Q3: 2.72
Median: 1.67
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 6.54, GGG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Machinery industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PAC

4.58

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 10.76
Q3: 5.52
Median: 2.96
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.84

PAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.58 aligns with the market consensus for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GGG

5.76

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.23
Q3: 3.90
Median: 2.52
Q1: 1.47
Min: 0.49

GGG’s P/B Ratio of 5.76 is in the upper tier for the Machinery industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PAC

9.90

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 4.46
Q3: 2.80
Median: 1.80
Q1: 1.12
Min: 0.37

At 9.90, PAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GGG vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	GGG	PAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	29.39	19.76
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	6.54	4.58
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	5.76	9.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	23.31	18.23