GGG vs. NOC: Graco vs. Northrop Grumman Stock Comparison
How do Graco (GGG) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Graco (GGG) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but GGG is classified in Machinery while NOC is classified in Aerospace & Defense.
| Profile Item | GGG | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Graco Inc. | Northrop Grumman Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 10.88 billion USD | 74.59 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | December 31, 1981 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | GGG | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -12.76% | -3.34% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -1.59% | 7.23% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -1.14% | 9.98% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Northrop Grumman (NOC) reports a negative beta of -0.12, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Graco (GGG) has a non-negative beta of 0.87.
| Metric | GGG | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 26.08% | 28.86% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.87 | -0.12 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -29.55% | -37.80% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.99M | 902.47K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | GGG | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.65 | -0.26 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.80 | -0.37 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Graco (GGG) at 20.38% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 26.07% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
GGG
Capital Goods industry group
20.38%
- Max
- 40.55%
- GGG
- 20.38%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
26.07%
- Max
- 40.55%
- NOC
- 26.07%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Graco (GGG) at 22.40% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 10.37%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
GGG
Capital Goods industry group
22.40%
- Max
- 27.47%
- GGG
- 22.40%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
10.37%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- NOC
- 10.37%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Graco (GGG) at 25.26% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 12.91%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
GGG
Capital Goods industry group
25.26%
- Max
- 36.60%
- GGG
- 25.26%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
12.91%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- NOC
- 12.91%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | GGG | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 20.38% | 26.07% |
| ROA (TTM) | 12.02% | 7.11% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 22.40% | 10.37% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 25.26% | 12.91% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 51.96% | 20.03% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Graco (GGG) at 5.83% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.24% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Graco (GGG) at 9.22% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.61% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | GGG | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.83% | 2.24% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 1.43% | 4.65% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 9.22% | 2.61% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 5.01% | -2.60% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Graco (GGG) at 2.13 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.23 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for NOC.
GGG
Capital Goods industry group
2.13
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- GGG
- 2.13
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.23
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- NOC
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Graco (GGG) at 0.07 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 0.93 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
GGG
Capital Goods industry group
0.07
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- GGG
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
0.93
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- NOC
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | GGG | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.13 | 1.23 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.07 | 0.93 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.03 | 1.87 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Graco (GGG) at 1.74% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.82% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.
GGG
Capital Goods industry group
1.74%
- Max
- 2.66%
- GGG
- 1.74%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.82%
- Max
- 2.66%
- NOC
- 1.82%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Graco (GGG) at 37.42% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 30.18% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
GGG
Capital Goods industry group
37.42%
- Max
- 67.39%
- GGG
- 37.42%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
30.18%
- Max
- 67.39%
- NOC
- 30.18%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | GGG | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.74% | 1.82% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 37.42% | 30.18% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 16.57 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Graco (GGG) at 21.89 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for NOC, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
GGG
Capital Goods industry group
21.89
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- GGG
- 21.89
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
16.57
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- NOC
- 16.57
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.71 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Graco (GGG) at 4.71 sits in the pricier quartile — GGG costs more per dollar of sales.
GGG
Capital Goods industry group
4.71
- Max
- 7.54
- GGG
- 4.71
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.71
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- NOC
- 1.71
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Graco (GGG) at 4.41 and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 3.99 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
GGG
Capital Goods industry group
4.41
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- GGG
- 4.41
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
3.99
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- NOC
- 3.99
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GGG | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 21.89 | 16.57 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.71 | 1.71 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.41 | 3.99 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.94% | 4.21% |