Seek Returns logo

GFS vs. MSI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GFS and MSI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGFSMSI
Company NameGlobalFoundries Inc.Motorola Solutions, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentCommunications Equipment
Market Capitalization18.33 billion USD76.99 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 28, 2021January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GFS and MSI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GFS vs. MSI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGFSMSI
5-Day Price Return-0.24%0.11%
13-Week Price Return-15.61%8.66%
26-Week Price Return-22.89%-0.84%
52-Week Price Return-28.67%9.40%
Month-to-Date Return-11.69%5.27%
Year-to-Date Return-23.05%-0.02%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.97M1.18M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.89M0.93M
3-Month Volatility37.41%14.67%
Beta1.530.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GFS

-1.03%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

GFS has a negative Return on Equity of -1.03%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MSI

127.51%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

MSI’s Return on Equity of 127.51% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GFS vs. MSI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GFS

-1.68%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

GFS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.68%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MSI

19.08%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.08% places MSI in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GFS vs. MSI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GFS

-2.47%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

GFS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.47%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MSI

25.23%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.23% places MSI in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GFS vs. MSI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGFSMSI
Return on Equity (TTM)-1.03%127.51%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.67%14.27%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-1.68%19.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.47%25.23%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)23.76%51.34%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GFS

2.63

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

GFS’s Current Ratio of 2.63 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MSI

1.73

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

MSI’s Current Ratio of 1.73 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

GFS vs. MSI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GFS

0.15

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

GFS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MSI

3.93

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.93, MSI operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Communications Equipment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GFS vs. MSI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GFS

29.37

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

GFS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 29.37 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MSI

8.92

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

MSI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GFS vs. MSI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGFSMSI
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.631.73
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.921.54
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.153.93
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)29.378.92

Growth

Revenue Growth

GFS vs. MSI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GFS vs. MSI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GFS

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MSI

0.90%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSI’s Dividend Yield of 0.90% is consistent with its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GFS vs. MSI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GFS

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MSI

32.70%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.70% is within the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GFS vs. MSI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGFSMSI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.90%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%32.70%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GFS

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

P/E Ratio data for GFS is currently unavailable.

MSI

36.30

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

MSI’s P/E Ratio of 36.30 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GFS vs. MSI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GFS

2.67

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

GFS’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MSI

6.93

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

MSI’s P/S Ratio of 6.93 is in the upper echelon for the Communications Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GFS vs. MSI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GFS

1.86

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

GFS’s P/B Ratio of 1.86 is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MSI

35.66

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

At 35.66, MSI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GFS vs. MSI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGFSMSI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--36.30
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.676.93
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.8635.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.7832.22