Seek Returns logo

GFS vs. KSPI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GFS and KSPI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GFS is a standard domestic listing, while KSPI trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolGFSKSPI
Company NameGlobalFoundries Inc.Joint Stock Company Kaspi.kz
CountryUnited StatesKazakhstan
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentConsumer Finance
Market Capitalization18.33 billion USD17.23 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 28, 2021January 19, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GFS and KSPI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GFS vs. KSPI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGFSKSPI
5-Day Price Return-0.24%-5.84%
13-Week Price Return-15.61%5.61%
26-Week Price Return-22.89%-17.32%
52-Week Price Return-28.67%-29.51%
Month-to-Date Return-11.69%14.46%
Year-to-Date Return-23.05%-4.65%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.97M0.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.89M0.30M
3-Month Volatility37.41%42.48%
Beta1.530.88

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GFS

-1.03%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

GFS has a negative Return on Equity of -1.03%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

KSPI

74.52%

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
32.87%
Q3
20.39%
Median
14.14%
Q1
7.64%
Min
-10.63%

KSPI’s Return on Equity of 74.52% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Consumer Finance industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GFS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GFS

-1.68%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

GFS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.68%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

KSPI

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
19.68%
Q3
15.94%
Median
13.37%
Q1
9.73%
Min
3.66%

Net Profit Margin data for KSPI is currently unavailable.

GFS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GFS

-2.47%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

GFS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.47%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

KSPI

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
50.11%
Q3
29.38%
Median
18.31%
Q1
14.26%
Min
-5.45%

Operating Profit Margin data for KSPI is currently unavailable.

GFS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGFSKSPI
Return on Equity (TTM)-1.03%74.52%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.67%13.24%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-1.68%--
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.47%--
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)23.76%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GFS

2.63

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

GFS’s Current Ratio of 2.63 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KSPI

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
5.34
Q3
4.21
Median
2.67
Q1
0.71
Min
0.20

For the Consumer Finance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

GFS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GFS

0.15

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

GFS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KSPI

0.23

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
6.63
Q3
3.39
Median
2.21
Q1
0.94
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Consumer Finance industry.

GFS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GFS

29.37

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

GFS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 29.37 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KSPI

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
49.63
Q3
39.33
Median
4.56
Q1
2.97
Min
-15.69

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Consumer Finance industry.

GFS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGFSKSPI
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.63--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.92--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.150.23
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)29.37--

Growth

Revenue Growth

GFS vs. KSPI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GFS vs. KSPI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GFS

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KSPI

6.73%

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
8.31%
Q3
3.93%
Median
2.51%
Q1
0.84%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.73%, KSPI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Consumer Finance industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GFS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GFS

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KSPI

78.77%

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
145.89%
Q3
88.53%
Median
23.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KSPI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 78.77% is within the typical range for the Consumer Finance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GFS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGFSKSPI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%6.73%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%78.77%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GFS

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

P/E Ratio data for GFS is currently unavailable.

KSPI

8.93

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
34.39
Q3
20.36
Median
13.05
Q1
9.29
Min
4.74

In the lower quartile for the Consumer Finance industry, KSPI’s P/E Ratio of 8.93 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

GFS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GFS

2.67

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

GFS’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KSPI

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
4.28
Q3
2.67
Median
1.88
Q1
1.15
Min
0.55

P/S Ratio data for KSPI is currently unavailable.

GFS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GFS

1.86

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

GFS’s P/B Ratio of 1.86 is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

KSPI

5.70

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.40
Median
1.96
Q1
1.16
Min
0.26

At 5.70, KSPI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Consumer Finance industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GFS vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGFSKSPI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--8.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.67--
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.865.70
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.7814.23