Seek Returns logo

GFS vs. JKHY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GFS and JKHY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGFSJKHY
Company NameGlobalFoundries Inc.Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentFinancial Services
Market Capitalization18.33 billion USD11.93 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 28, 2021November 20, 1985
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GFS and JKHY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GFS vs. JKHY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGFSJKHY
5-Day Price Return-0.24%2.86%
13-Week Price Return-15.61%-11.12%
26-Week Price Return-22.89%-3.91%
52-Week Price Return-28.67%-0.18%
Month-to-Date Return-11.69%-3.54%
Year-to-Date Return-23.05%-6.56%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.97M1.02M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.89M0.62M
3-Month Volatility37.41%18.97%
Beta1.530.80

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GFS

-1.03%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

GFS has a negative Return on Equity of -1.03%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

JKHY

22.07%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

In the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, JKHY’s Return on Equity of 22.07% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GFS vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GFS

-1.68%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

GFS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.68%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

JKHY

19.19%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

JKHY’s Net Profit Margin of 19.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GFS vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GFS

-2.47%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

GFS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.47%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

JKHY

23.94%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

JKHY’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.94% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GFS vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGFSJKHY
Return on Equity (TTM)-1.03%22.07%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.67%14.68%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-1.68%19.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.47%23.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)23.76%42.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GFS

2.63

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

GFS’s Current Ratio of 2.63 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JKHY

1.36

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

GFS vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GFS

0.15

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

GFS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JKHY

0.08

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

GFS vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GFS

29.37

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

GFS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 29.37 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

JKHY

78.80

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

GFS vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGFSJKHY
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.631.36
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.921.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.150.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)29.3778.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

GFS vs. JKHY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GFS vs. JKHY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GFS

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JKHY

1.35%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JKHY’s Dividend Yield of 1.35% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GFS vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GFS

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JKHY

37.87%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JKHY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 37.87% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GFS vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGFSJKHY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%37.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GFS

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

P/E Ratio data for GFS is currently unavailable.

JKHY

26.34

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

JKHY’s P/E Ratio of 26.34 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GFS vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GFS

2.67

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

GFS’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

JKHY

5.05

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

GFS vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GFS

1.86

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

GFS’s P/B Ratio of 1.86 is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

JKHY

6.54

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

JKHY’s P/B Ratio of 6.54 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GFS vs. JKHY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGFSJKHY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--26.34
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.675.05
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.866.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.7839.66