Seek Returns logo

GFS vs. IBM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GFS and IBM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGFSIBM
Company NameGLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.International Business Machines Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentIT Services
Market Capitalization18.61 billion USD281.44 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 28, 2021January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GFS and IBM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GFS vs. IBM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGFSIBM
5-Day Price Return-4.54%-1.11%
13-Week Price Return-0.06%27.52%
26-Week Price Return-16.75%18.21%
52-Week Price Return-22.07%44.93%
Month-to-Date Return-7.16%-0.56%
Year-to-Date Return-22.98%39.06%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.73M4.95M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.96M5.47M
3-Month Volatility39.95%27.54%
Beta1.520.68

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GFS

-0.39%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
49.05%
Q3
22.19%
Median
7.96%
Q1
0.99%
Min
-15.65%

GFS has a negative Return on Equity of -0.39%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

IBM

28.86%

IT Services Industry

Max
37.08%
Q3
19.28%
Median
14.70%
Q1
6.70%
Min
-8.16%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, IBM’s Return on Equity of 28.86% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GFS vs. IBM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GFS

-0.65%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
24.47%
Median
11.88%
Q1
0.60%
Min
-25.46%

GFS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.65%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

IBM

12.09%

IT Services Industry

Max
17.01%
Q3
11.02%
Median
6.91%
Q1
3.07%
Min
-5.13%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.09% places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GFS vs. IBM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GFS

-2.34%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.76%
Median
12.14%
Q1
3.29%
Min
-32.60%

GFS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.34%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

IBM

14.51%

IT Services Industry

Max
23.01%
Q3
15.32%
Median
9.57%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.58%

IBM’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.51% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GFS vs. IBM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGFSIBM
Return on Equity (TTM)-0.39%28.86%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.26%5.48%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.65%12.09%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.34%14.51%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)24.02%57.81%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GFS

3.03

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.57
Q3
4.28
Median
2.86
Q1
2.22
Min
1.02

GFS’s Current Ratio of 3.03 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IBM

0.93

IT Services Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.91
Median
1.36
Q1
1.02
Min
0.49

IBM’s Current Ratio of 0.93 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GFS vs. IBM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GFS

0.14

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.18
Q3
0.48
Median
0.24
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

GFS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IBM

2.26

IT Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.30
Median
0.55
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.26. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GFS vs. IBM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GFS

29.37

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.21
Median
22.37
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

GFS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 29.37 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IBM

45.57

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
1.68
Min
-28.15

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GFS vs. IBM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGFSIBM
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.030.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.240.81
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.142.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)29.3745.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

GFS vs. IBM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GFS vs. IBM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GFS

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.58%
Q3
1.59%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IBM

2.20%

IT Services Industry

Max
4.66%
Q3
2.02%
Median
0.66%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.20%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the IT Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GFS vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GFS

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
211.90%
Q3
88.01%
Median
25.84%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IBM

78.74%

IT Services Industry

Max
93.78%
Q3
63.22%
Median
24.64%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 78.74% is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

GFS vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGFSIBM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.20%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%78.74%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GFS

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
95.58
Q3
58.67
Median
34.77
Q1
25.45
Min
12.63

P/E Ratio data for GFS is currently unavailable.

IBM

35.83

IT Services Industry

Max
45.03
Q3
30.25
Median
21.01
Q1
16.50
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 35.83 places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GFS vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GFS

2.68

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
18.34
Q3
10.38
Median
5.38
Q1
2.49
Min
0.32

GFS’s P/S Ratio of 2.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IBM

4.33

IT Services Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.01
Median
2.18
Q1
1.08
Min
0.00

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 4.33 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GFS vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GFS

1.70

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.22
Q3
8.33
Median
4.39
Q1
1.79
Min
0.30

GFS’s P/B Ratio of 1.70 is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

IBM

9.42

IT Services Industry

Max
9.42
Q3
5.79
Median
3.70
Q1
2.30
Min
0.79

IBM’s P/B Ratio of 9.42 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GFS vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGFSIBM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--35.83
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.684.33
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.709.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.6423.67