Seek Returns logo

GFS vs. HOOD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GFS and HOOD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGFSHOOD
Company NameGlobalFoundries Inc.Robinhood Markets, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentCapital Markets
Market Capitalization19.92 billion USD134.07 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 28, 2021July 29, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GFS and HOOD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GFS vs. HOOD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGFSHOOD
5-Day Price Return0.45%3.55%
13-Week Price Return-12.42%59.58%
26-Week Price Return4.45%294.33%
52-Week Price Return-9.64%546.96%
Month-to-Date Return0.17%5.37%
Year-to-Date Return-16.34%304.91%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.77M35.23M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.51M44.86M
3-Month Volatility39.62%57.73%
Beta1.522.43

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GFS

-1.03%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

GFS has a negative Return on Equity of -1.03%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

HOOD

22.92%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
22.24%
Median
13.52%
Q1
8.61%
Min
-4.25%

In the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, HOOD’s Return on Equity of 22.92% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GFS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GFS

-1.68%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

GFS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.68%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

HOOD

50.13%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
69.91%
Q3
37.24%
Median
24.30%
Q1
13.06%
Min
-15.18%

A Net Profit Margin of 50.13% places HOOD in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GFS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GFS

-2.47%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

GFS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.47%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

HOOD

42.50%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
84.86%
Q3
47.16%
Median
32.23%
Q1
18.65%
Min
-21.87%

HOOD’s Operating Profit Margin of 42.50% is around the midpoint for the Capital Markets industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GFS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGFSHOOD
Return on Equity (TTM)-1.03%22.92%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.67%5.41%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-1.68%50.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.47%42.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)23.76%94.76%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GFS

2.63

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

GFS’s Current Ratio of 2.63 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HOOD

1.25

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
1.81
Median
1.01
Q1
0.56
Min
0.04

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

GFS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GFS

0.15

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

GFS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HOOD

1.57

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
2.79
Median
0.96
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

GFS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GFS

29.37

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

GFS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 29.37 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HOOD

--

Capital Markets Industry

Max
107.59
Q3
48.41
Median
10.85
Q1
4.56
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

GFS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGFSHOOD
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.631.25
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.921.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.151.57
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)29.37--

Growth

Revenue Growth

GFS vs. HOOD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GFS vs. HOOD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GFS

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HOOD

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.02%
Q3
4.54%
Median
2.55%
Q1
1.27%
Min
0.00%

HOOD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GFS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GFS

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HOOD

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
199.38%
Q3
99.28%
Median
60.67%
Q1
32.00%
Min
0.00%

HOOD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GFS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGFSHOOD
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GFS

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

P/E Ratio data for GFS is currently unavailable.

HOOD

74.99

Capital Markets Industry

Max
51.69
Q3
29.42
Median
17.58
Q1
12.55
Min
5.59

At 74.99, HOOD’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GFS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GFS

2.90

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

GFS’s P/S Ratio of 2.90 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HOOD

37.59

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.65
Q3
7.29
Median
4.53
Q1
2.26
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 37.59, HOOD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Capital Markets industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GFS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GFS

1.86

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

GFS’s P/B Ratio of 1.86 is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

HOOD

10.24

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.83
Q3
5.12
Median
2.66
Q1
1.19
Min
0.37

HOOD’s P/B Ratio of 10.24 is in the upper tier for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GFS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGFSHOOD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--74.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.9037.59
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.8610.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.4222.67