Seek Returns logo

GFL vs. UNP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GFL and UNP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGFLUNP
Company NameGFL Environmental Inc.Union Pacific Corporation
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization16.94 billion USD140.45 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 3, 2020January 2, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GFL and UNP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GFL vs. UNP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGFLUNP
5-Day Price Return0.49%0.26%
13-Week Price Return-0.61%0.22%
26-Week Price Return-4.49%0.24%
52-Week Price Return22.38%-2.69%
Month-to-Date Return-1.02%0.18%
Year-to-Date Return1.89%3.84%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.75M5.01M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.44M4.28M
3-Month Volatility22.14%18.63%
Beta0.481.02

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GFL

48.97%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

GFL’s Return on Equity of 48.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UNP

42.18%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

UNP’s Return on Equity of 42.18% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GFL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GFL

49.85%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

GFL’s Net Profit Margin of 49.85% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

UNP

28.43%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.43% places UNP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GFL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GFL

5.83%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

GFL’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.83% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UNP

40.33%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

An Operating Profit Margin of 40.33% places UNP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GFL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGFLUNP
Return on Equity (TTM)48.97%42.18%
Return on Assets (TTM)18.18%10.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)49.85%28.43%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.83%40.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.03%79.89%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GFL

0.67

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

GFL’s Current Ratio of 0.67 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UNP

0.65

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

UNP’s Current Ratio of 0.65 falls into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GFL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GFL

0.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

GFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.94 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UNP

2.02

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

UNP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Ground Transportation industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.02. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GFL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GFL

-0.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

GFL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.09. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

UNP

8.23

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

UNP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GFL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGFLUNP
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.670.65
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.550.53
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.942.02
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.098.23

Growth

Revenue Growth

GFL vs. UNP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GFL vs. UNP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GFL

0.13%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Yield of 0.13% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

UNP

2.30%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

UNP’s Dividend Yield of 2.30% is consistent with its peers in the Ground Transportation industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GFL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GFL

0.61%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.61% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

UNP

46.49%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

UNP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.49% is within the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GFL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGFLUNP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.13%2.30%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.61%46.49%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GFL

6.58

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

In the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, GFL’s P/E Ratio of 6.58 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

UNP

20.25

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

UNP’s P/E Ratio of 20.25 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GFL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GFL

3.28

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

GFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.28 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UNP

5.76

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 5.76, UNP trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GFL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GFL

3.27

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

GFL’s P/B Ratio of 3.27 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UNP

8.46

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

At 8.46, UNP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GFL vs. UNP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGFLUNP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)6.5820.25
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.285.76
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.278.46
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)71.6322.43