Seek Returns logo

GFL vs. RBC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GFL and RBC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGFLRBC
Company NameGFL Environmental Inc.RBC Bearings Incorporated
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesMachinery
Market Capitalization18.34 billion USD12.40 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 3, 2020August 10, 2005
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GFL and RBC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GFL vs. RBC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGFLRBC
5-Day Price Return-0.69%-2.28%
13-Week Price Return-0.10%4.14%
26-Week Price Return5.17%8.27%
52-Week Price Return21.85%36.53%
Month-to-Date Return-1.13%1.40%
Year-to-Date Return7.66%31.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.28M0.16M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.36M0.17M
3-Month Volatility21.45%20.64%
Beta0.651.76

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GFL

48.97%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

GFL’s Return on Equity of 48.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

RBC

8.45%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

RBC’s Return on Equity of 8.45% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

GFL vs. RBC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GFL

49.85%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

GFL’s Net Profit Margin of 49.85% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

RBC

15.05%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.05% places RBC in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GFL vs. RBC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GFL

5.83%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

GFL’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.83% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RBC

22.36%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.36% places RBC in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GFL vs. RBC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGFLRBC
Return on Equity (TTM)48.97%8.45%
Return on Assets (TTM)18.18%5.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)49.85%15.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.83%22.36%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.03%44.37%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GFL

0.67

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

GFL’s Current Ratio of 0.67 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RBC

3.26

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

RBC’s Current Ratio of 3.26 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GFL vs. RBC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GFL

0.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

GFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.94 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RBC

0.31

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

RBC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.31 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GFL vs. RBC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GFL

-0.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

GFL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.09. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

RBC

6.22

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, RBC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.22 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GFL vs. RBC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGFLRBC
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.673.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.551.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.940.31
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.096.22

Growth

Revenue Growth

GFL vs. RBC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GFL vs. RBC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GFL

0.12%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Yield of 0.12% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

RBC

0.14%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

RBC’s Dividend Yield of 0.14% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

GFL vs. RBC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GFL

0.61%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.61% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

RBC

9.74%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

RBC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.74% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

GFL vs. RBC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGFLRBC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.12%0.14%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.61%9.74%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GFL

7.01

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, GFL’s P/E Ratio of 7.01 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

RBC

51.06

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

A P/E Ratio of 51.06 places RBC in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GFL vs. RBC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GFL

3.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

GFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.50 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RBC

7.68

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 7.68, RBC trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Machinery industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GFL vs. RBC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GFL

3.27

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

GFL’s P/B Ratio of 3.27 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RBC

3.34

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

RBC’s P/B Ratio of 3.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GFL vs. RBC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGFLRBC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)7.0151.06
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.507.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.273.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)76.3951.57