Seek Returns logo

GFL vs. MTZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GFL and MTZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGFLMTZ
Company NameGFL Environmental Inc.MasTec, Inc.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization18.03 billion USD14.20 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 3, 2020February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GFL and MTZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GFL vs. MTZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGFLMTZ
5-Day Price Return-1.37%3.64%
13-Week Price Return0.26%15.80%
26-Week Price Return5.42%42.28%
52-Week Price Return20.01%62.34%
Month-to-Date Return-1.06%-4.87%
Year-to-Date Return7.74%32.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.54M0.86M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.39M0.90M
3-Month Volatility21.98%28.63%
Beta0.651.82

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GFL

48.97%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

GFL’s Return on Equity of 48.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MTZ

9.20%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

MTZ’s Return on Equity of 9.20% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GFL vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GFL

49.85%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

GFL’s Net Profit Margin of 49.85% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MTZ

2.04%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Net Profit Margin of 2.04% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

GFL vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GFL

5.83%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

GFL’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.83% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MTZ

3.86%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

MTZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.86% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GFL vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGFLMTZ
Return on Equity (TTM)48.97%9.20%
Return on Assets (TTM)18.18%2.97%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)49.85%2.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.83%3.86%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.03%12.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GFL

0.67

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

GFL’s Current Ratio of 0.67 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MTZ

1.22

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

MTZ’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GFL vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GFL

0.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

GFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.94 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MTZ

0.77

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

MTZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GFL vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GFL

-0.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

GFL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.09. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MTZ

2.54

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.54 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GFL vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGFLMTZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.671.22
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.551.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.940.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.092.54

Growth

Revenue Growth

GFL vs. MTZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GFL vs. MTZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GFL

0.12%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Yield of 0.12% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

MTZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GFL vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GFL

0.61%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.61% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

MTZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GFL vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGFLMTZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.12%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.61%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GFL

7.01

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, GFL’s P/E Ratio of 7.01 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MTZ

51.22

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 51.22, MTZ’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GFL vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GFL

3.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

GFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.50 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MTZ

1.04

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

MTZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.04 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GFL vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GFL

3.27

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

GFL’s P/B Ratio of 3.27 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MTZ

4.56

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

MTZ’s P/B Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GFL vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGFLMTZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)7.0151.22
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.501.04
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.274.56
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)76.3914.77