Seek Returns logo

GFL vs. MMM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GFL and MMM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGFLMMM
Company NameGFL Environmental Inc.3M Company
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesIndustrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization18.18 billion USD82.84 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 3, 2020January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GFL and MMM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GFL vs. MMM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGFLMMM
5-Day Price Return-3.90%-0.21%
13-Week Price Return-1.44%3.94%
26-Week Price Return3.37%6.13%
52-Week Price Return18.16%18.17%
Month-to-Date Return-2.82%4.23%
Year-to-Date Return5.82%20.48%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.53M2.52M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.39M3.26M
3-Month Volatility21.73%23.07%
Beta0.651.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GFL

48.97%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

GFL’s Return on Equity of 48.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
14.23%
Median
7.81%
Q1
5.91%
Min
-3.58%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GFL vs. MMM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GFL

49.85%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

GFL’s Net Profit Margin of 49.85% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
18.70%
Q3
12.58%
Median
9.26%
Q1
3.87%
Min
-2.26%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GFL vs. MMM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GFL

5.83%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

GFL’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.83% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
25.69%
Q3
17.03%
Median
12.85%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-0.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GFL vs. MMM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGFLMMM
Return on Equity (TTM)48.97%91.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)18.18%9.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)49.85%16.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.83%19.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.03%41.11%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GFL

0.67

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

GFL’s Current Ratio of 0.67 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.64
Median
1.38
Q1
1.13
Min
0.61

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GFL vs. MMM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GFL

0.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

GFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.94 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.47
Median
0.99
Q1
0.66
Min
0.21

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GFL vs. MMM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GFL

-0.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

GFL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.09. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
11.17
Q3
8.02
Median
5.88
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GFL vs. MMM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGFLMMM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.671.72
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.551.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.943.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.09-15.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

GFL vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GFL vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GFL

0.12%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Yield of 0.12% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MMM

1.88%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
10.17%
Q3
5.53%
Median
3.14%
Q1
1.88%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

GFL vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GFL

0.61%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.61% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
181.91%
Q3
95.57%
Median
50.60%
Q1
35.01%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GFL vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGFLMMM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.12%1.88%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.61%39.27%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GFL

7.01

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, GFL’s P/E Ratio of 7.01 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MMM

20.92

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
36.98
Q3
22.09
Median
12.18
Q1
8.93
Min
5.63

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 20.92 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GFL vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GFL

3.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

GFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.50 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MMM

3.35

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
3.60
Q3
2.10
Median
0.68
Q1
0.42
Min
0.11

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GFL vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GFL

3.27

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

GFL’s P/B Ratio of 3.27 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.89
Q3
2.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.60
Min
0.27

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GFL vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGFLMMM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)7.0120.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.503.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.2718.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)76.3930.86