GFF vs. MMM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 29, 2025

Here’s a clear look at GFF and MMM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	GFF	MMM
Company Name	Griffon Corporation	3M Company
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Building Products	Industrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization	3.64 billion USD	83.37 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	May 3, 1973	January 2, 1962
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GFF and MMM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GFF vs. MMM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	GFF	MMM
5-Day Price Return	8.04%	1.39%
13-Week Price Return	12.73%	4.71%
26-Week Price Return	7.55%	7.97%
52-Week Price Return	17.45%	18.72%
Month-to-Date Return	-3.93%	4.90%
Year-to-Date Return	9.56%	21.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.36M	2.92M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.40M	3.34M
3-Month Volatility	40.72%	23.03%
Beta	1.10	1.05

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GFF

38.27%

Building Products Industry

Max: 48.58%
Q3: 27.65%
Median: 16.01%
Q1: 8.81%
Min: -6.66%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, GFF’s Return on Equity of 38.27% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 21.93%
Q3: 14.23%
Median: 7.81%
Q1: 5.91%
Min: -3.58%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GFF vs. MMM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GFF

2.78%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.11%
Q3: 15.09%
Median: 9.48%
Q1: 5.16%
Min: -3.43%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, GFF’s Net Profit Margin of 2.78% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 18.70%
Q3: 12.58%
Median: 9.26%
Q1: 3.87%
Min: -2.26%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GFF vs. MMM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GFF

7.90%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.67%
Q3: 18.75%
Median: 14.89%
Q1: 8.70%
Min: -1.00%

GFF’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.90% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 25.69%
Q3: 17.03%
Median: 12.85%
Q1: 8.81%
Min: -0.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GFF vs. MMM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	GFF	MMM
Return on Equity (TTM)	38.27%	91.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)	3.07%	9.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	2.78%	16.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	7.90%	19.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	41.80%	41.11%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GFF

2.70

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.87
Q3: 2.03
Median: 1.60
Q1: 1.32
Min: 0.88

GFF’s Current Ratio of 2.70 is in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 2.19
Q3: 1.64
Median: 1.38
Q1: 1.13
Min: 0.61

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GFF vs. MMM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GFF

22.71

Building Products Industry

Max: 1.64
Q3: 1.02
Median: 0.66
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 22.71, GFF operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Building Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 2.27
Q3: 1.47
Median: 0.99
Q1: 0.66
Min: 0.21

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GFF vs. MMM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GFF

3.91

Building Products Industry

Max: 72.12
Q3: 34.39
Median: 15.31
Q1: 6.06
Min: 0.85

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, GFF’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.91 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 11.17
Q3: 8.02
Median: 5.88
Q1: 2.73
Min: -2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GFF vs. MMM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	GFF	MMM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.70	1.72
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.14	1.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	22.71	3.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	3.91	-15.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

GFF vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GFF vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GFF

1.14%

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.56%
Q3: 1.94%
Median: 1.04%
Q1: 0.66%
Min: 0.00%

GFF’s Dividend Yield of 1.14% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MMM

1.88%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 10.17%
Q3: 5.53%
Median: 3.14%
Q1: 1.88%
Min: 0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

GFF vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GFF

16.25%

Building Products Industry

Max: 157.36%
Q3: 77.74%
Median: 29.49%
Q1: 16.25%
Min: 0.00%

GFF’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 16.25% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 181.91%
Q3: 95.57%
Median: 50.60%
Q1: 35.01%
Min: 1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GFF vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	GFF	MMM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.14%	1.88%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	16.25%	39.27%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GFF

48.29

Building Products Industry

Max: 66.79
Q3: 37.37
Median: 21.86
Q1: 17.57
Min: 9.70

A P/E Ratio of 48.29 places GFF in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MMM

20.92

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 36.98
Q3: 22.09
Median: 12.18
Q1: 8.93
Min: 5.63

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 20.92 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GFF vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GFF

1.34

Building Products Industry

Max: 6.40
Q3: 3.25
Median: 1.65
Q1: 1.11
Min: 0.34

GFF’s P/S Ratio of 1.34 aligns with the market consensus for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MMM

3.35

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 3.60
Q3: 2.10
Median: 0.68
Q1: 0.42
Min: 0.11

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GFF vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GFF

53.26

Building Products Industry

Max: 13.31
Q3: 6.85
Median: 3.20
Q1: 1.71
Min: 0.73

At 53.26, GFF’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Building Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 4.89
Q3: 2.51
Median: 1.06
Q1: 0.60
Min: 0.27

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GFF vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	GFF	MMM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	48.29	20.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.34	3.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	53.26	18.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	11.48	30.86