Seek Returns logo

GEV vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GEV and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGEVUBER
Company NameGE Vernova Inc.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentGround Transportation
Market Capitalization163.96 billion USD198.45 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 27, 2024May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GEV and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GEV vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGEVUBER
5-Day Price Return-0.14%-0.17%
13-Week Price Return31.27%8.14%
26-Week Price Return60.53%17.25%
52-Week Price Return223.82%29.80%
Month-to-Date Return-8.78%8.44%
Year-to-Date Return83.11%57.76%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.67M15.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.02M20.51M
3-Month Volatility40.90%29.36%
Beta1.611.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GEV

12.65%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

GEV’s Return on Equity of 12.65% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GEV vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GEV

3.15%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, GEV’s Net Profit Margin of 3.15% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GEV vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GEV

2.65%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

GEV’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.65% is in the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GEV vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGEVUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)12.65%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.23%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.15%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)2.65%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)18.47%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GEV

1.03

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

GEV’s Current Ratio of 1.03 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GEV vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GEV

0.00

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, GEV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GEV vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GEV

-0.05

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

GEV has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GEV vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGEVUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.031.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.740.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.05-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

GEV vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GEV vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GEV

0.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GEV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GEV vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GEV

0.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GEV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GEV vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGEVUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GEV

142.50

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

At 142.50, GEV’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GEV vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GEV

4.50

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

GEV’s P/S Ratio of 4.50 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GEV vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GEV

16.27

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

At 16.27, GEV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GEV vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGEVUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)142.5015.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.504.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)16.278.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)60.7822.90