Seek Returns logo

GE vs. VRSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GE and VRSK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGEVRSK
Company NameGE AerospaceVerisk Analytics, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryIndustrial ConglomeratesProfessional Services
Market Capitalization304.81 billion USD31.18 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962October 7, 2009
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GE and VRSK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GE vs. VRSK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGEVRSK
5-Day Price Return-4.66%2.80%
13-Week Price Return8.15%-18.40%
26-Week Price Return23.52%-29.42%
52-Week Price Return63.67%-21.22%
Month-to-Date Return-5.93%1.43%
Year-to-Date Return74.24%-19.44%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.58M1.48M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.22M1.33M
3-Month Volatility22.58%31.01%
Beta1.440.79

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GE

42.13%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
19.60%
Q3
13.46%
Median
9.41%
Q1
5.80%
Min
-3.73%

GE’s Return on Equity of 42.13% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VRSK

404.39%

Professional Services Industry

Max
50.82%
Q3
32.98%
Median
21.73%
Q1
12.35%
Min
-10.69%

VRSK’s Return on Equity of 404.39% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GE vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GE

18.34%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
26.43%
Q3
13.08%
Median
9.45%
Q1
3.04%
Min
-2.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.34% places GE in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VRSK

30.42%

Professional Services Industry

Max
27.86%
Q3
14.27%
Median
7.71%
Q1
4.47%
Min
-9.49%

VRSK’s Net Profit Margin of 30.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

GE vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GE

17.00%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
27.02%
Q3
17.23%
Median
12.77%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-4.49%

GE’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.00% is around the midpoint for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VRSK

44.45%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.71%
Q3
19.52%
Median
12.30%
Q1
7.86%
Min
-1.29%

VRSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 44.45% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

GE vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGEVRSK
Return on Equity (TTM)42.13%404.39%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.44%18.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.34%30.42%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.00%44.45%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)35.88%69.62%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GE

1.08

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.18
Q3
1.64
Median
1.35
Q1
1.15
Min
0.50

GE’s Current Ratio of 1.08 falls into the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VRSK

1.19

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.69
Median
1.33
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

VRSK’s Current Ratio of 1.19 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GE vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GE

1.11

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.52
Median
0.90
Q1
0.64
Min
0.20

GE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.11 is typical for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VRSK

12.52

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.54
Median
0.94
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 12.52, VRSK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GE vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GE

5.01

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
13.50
Q3
9.20
Median
4.18
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

GE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.01 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VRSK

43.51

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.05
Median
11.35
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.51, VRSK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

GE vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGEVRSK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.081.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.761.16
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.1112.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.0143.51

Growth

Revenue Growth

GE vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GE vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GE

0.45%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
10.91%
Q3
5.53%
Median
3.21%
Q1
1.62%
Min
0.00%

GE’s Dividend Yield of 0.45% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

VRSK

0.82%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.35%
Q3
2.86%
Median
1.57%
Q1
0.72%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.82% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GE vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GE

17.08%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
182.48%
Q3
97.89%
Median
52.41%
Q1
31.27%
Min
1.76%

GE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.08% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

VRSK

26.40%

Professional Services Industry

Max
99.60%
Q3
69.06%
Median
43.41%
Q1
19.44%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 26.40% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GE vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGEVRSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.45%0.82%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)17.08%26.40%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GE

38.02

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
45.03
Q3
27.19
Median
16.85
Q1
7.93
Min
3.88

A P/E Ratio of 38.02 places GE in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

VRSK

32.20

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.91
Q3
32.20
Median
25.00
Q1
17.95
Min
6.60

VRSK’s P/E Ratio of 32.20 is within the middle range for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GE vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GE

6.98

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.36
Median
0.76
Q1
0.43
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 6.98, GE trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

VRSK

9.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.52
Q3
4.25
Median
2.07
Q1
0.84
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 9.79, VRSK trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GE vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GE

16.96

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
5.48
Q3
2.86
Median
1.03
Q1
0.51
Min
0.30

At 16.96, GE’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VRSK

93.28

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.65
Q3
9.28
Median
6.16
Q1
2.96
Min
0.53

At 93.28, VRSK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GE vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGEVRSK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)38.0232.20
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.989.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)16.9693.28
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)47.5626.59