GE vs. TRI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 4, 2025

Here’s a clear look at GE and TRI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	GE	TRI
Company Name	GE Aerospace	Thomson Reuters Corporation
Country	United States	Canada
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Industrial Conglomerates	Professional Services
Market Capitalization	319.06 billion USD	70.72 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	January 2, 1962	June 12, 2002
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GE and TRI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GE vs. TRI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	GE	TRI
5-Day Price Return	0.17%	-1.45%
13-Week Price Return	16.87%	-20.30%
26-Week Price Return	45.06%	-11.99%
52-Week Price Return	62.27%	-6.32%
Month-to-Date Return	9.31%	-11.40%
Year-to-Date Return	80.36%	-6.38%
10-Day Avg. Volume	4.76M	0.71M
3-Month Avg. Volume	5.78M	0.43M
3-Month Volatility	22.47%	32.21%
Beta	1.59	0.36

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GE

40.51%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 21.93%
Q3: 13.64%
Median: 9.41%
Q1: 5.80%
Min: -3.73%

GE’s Return on Equity of 40.51% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TRI

13.40%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 68.01%
Q3: 35.32%
Median: 21.92%
Q1: 11.67%
Min: -20.25%

TRI’s Return on Equity of 13.40% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GE vs. TRI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GE

18.64%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 26.43%
Q3: 13.08%
Median: 9.39%
Q1: 3.21%
Min: -2.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.64% places GE in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TRI

22.34%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 31.75%
Q3: 15.50%
Median: 8.95%
Q1: 4.51%
Min: 0.35%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.34% places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GE vs. TRI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GE

15.53%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 27.02%
Q3: 17.23%
Median: 12.90%
Q1: 8.32%
Min: -3.91%

GE’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.53% is around the midpoint for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TRI

29.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 30.62%
Q3: 19.06%
Median: 13.60%
Q1: 8.60%
Min: -2.18%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.19% places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GE vs. TRI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	GE	TRI
Return on Equity (TTM)	40.51%	13.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)	6.22%	8.92%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	18.64%	22.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	15.53%	29.19%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	35.97%	95.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GE

1.04

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 2.40
Q3: 1.69
Median: 1.35
Q1: 1.14
Min: 0.56

GE’s Current Ratio of 1.04 falls into the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TRI

0.79

Professional Services Industry

Max: 2.28
Q3: 1.75
Median: 1.34
Q1: 1.10
Min: 0.47

TRI’s Current Ratio of 0.79 falls into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GE vs. TRI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GE

0.99

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 2.27
Q3: 1.49
Median: 0.91
Q1: 0.63
Min: 0.24

GE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.99 is typical for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TRI

0.17

Professional Services Industry

Max: 2.93
Q3: 1.45
Median: 0.98
Q1: 0.45
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, TRI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GE vs. TRI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GE

5.01

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 19.80
Q3: 10.68
Median: 4.59
Q1: 2.73
Min: -2.15

GE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.01 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TRI

17.23

Professional Services Industry

Max: 39.45
Q3: 20.41
Median: 11.64
Q1: 5.46
Min: -1.21

TRI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GE vs. TRI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	GE	TRI
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.04	0.79
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.73	0.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.99	0.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	5.01	17.23

Growth

Revenue Growth

GE vs. TRI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GE vs. TRI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GE

0.41%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 9.82%
Q3: 5.04%
Median: 3.09%
Q1: 1.67%
Min: 0.00%

GE’s Dividend Yield of 0.41% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

TRI

1.42%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 4.83%
Q3: 2.44%
Median: 1.52%
Q1: 0.52%
Min: 0.00%

TRI’s Dividend Yield of 1.42% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GE vs. TRI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GE

16.78%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 182.48%
Q3: 97.89%
Median: 55.48%
Q1: 31.63%
Min: 1.76%

GE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 16.78% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

TRI

60.86%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 128.51%
Q3: 69.03%
Median: 47.00%
Q1: 18.05%
Min: 0.00%

TRI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 60.86% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GE vs. TRI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	GE	TRI
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.41%	1.42%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	16.78%	60.86%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GE

40.83

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 45.17
Q3: 25.68
Median: 15.16
Q1: 8.58
Min: 0.79

A P/E Ratio of 40.83 places GE in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TRI

42.74

Professional Services Industry

Max: 52.60
Q3: 33.83
Median: 24.95
Q1: 17.59
Min: 7.96

A P/E Ratio of 42.74 places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GE vs. TRI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GE

7.61

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 4.18
Q3: 2.15
Median: 0.69
Q1: 0.41
Min: 0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 7.61, GE trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TRI

9.55

Professional Services Industry

Max: 8.27
Q3: 4.40
Median: 2.09
Q1: 0.99
Min: 0.17

With a P/S Ratio of 9.55, TRI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GE vs. TRI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GE

14.26

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max: 5.44
Q3: 2.68
Median: 0.97
Q1: 0.52
Min: 0.04

At 14.26, GE’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TRI

7.02

Professional Services Industry

Max: 18.75
Q3: 9.53
Median: 5.88
Q1: 2.95
Min: 0.59

TRI’s P/B Ratio of 7.02 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GE vs. TRI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	GE	TRI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	40.83	42.74
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	7.61	9.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	14.26	7.02
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	57.66	37.03