Seek Returns logo

GDS vs. ZM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GDS and ZM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, ZM is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolGDSZM
Company NameGDS Holdings LimitedZoom Communications Inc.
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryIT ServicesSoftware
Market Capitalization7.81 billion USD25.29 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 2, 2016April 18, 2019
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GDS and ZM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GDS vs. ZM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGDSZM
5-Day Price Return-0.25%-3.23%
13-Week Price Return41.88%4.78%
26-Week Price Return50.68%5.86%
52-Week Price Return-19.97%16.55%
Month-to-Date Return18.72%-1.48%
Year-to-Date Return75.79%-0.40%
10-Day Avg. Volume12.22M3.00M
3-Month Avg. Volume10.28M3.21M
3-Month Volatility64.12%34.63%
Beta1.880.82

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GDS

19.17%

IT Services Industry

Max
32.78%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.86%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-10.00%

GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.17% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ZM

13.40%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

ZM’s Return on Equity of 13.40% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GDS vs. ZM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

42.87%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.71%
Q3
11.01%
Median
6.66%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-6.22%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 42.87% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ZM

24.99%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.99% places ZM in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GDS vs. ZM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

22.44%

IT Services Industry

Max
22.44%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.82%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.89%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.44% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ZM

20.43%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

ZM’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.43% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GDS vs. ZM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGDSZM
Return on Equity (TTM)19.17%13.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.08%10.88%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)42.87%24.99%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.44%20.43%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.45%76.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

2.00

IT Services Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
2.00
Median
1.47
Q1
1.05
Min
0.52

GDS’s Current Ratio of 2.00 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ZM

4.45

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

ZM’s Current Ratio of 4.45 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

GDS vs. ZM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.82

IT Services Industry

Max
3.11
Q3
1.55
Median
0.55
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.82. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ZM

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

ZM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GDS vs. ZM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
0.77
Min
-28.15

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

ZM

7.63

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

ZM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.63 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GDS vs. ZM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGDSZM
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.004.45
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.934.36
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.820.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.667.63

Growth

Revenue Growth

GDS vs. ZM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GDS vs. ZM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.79%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ZM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GDS vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
107.85%
Q3
52.62%
Median
22.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ZM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GDS vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGDSZM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GDS

12.57

IT Services Industry

Max
56.41
Q3
33.17
Median
23.17
Q1
16.18
Min
6.62

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 12.57 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ZM

21.32

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, ZM’s P/E Ratio of 21.32 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

GDS vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GDS

5.39

IT Services Industry

Max
5.99
Q3
4.26
Median
1.93
Q1
0.97
Min
0.12

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 5.39 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ZM

5.33

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

ZM’s P/S Ratio of 5.33 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GDS vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.61

IT Services Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.54
Median
3.84
Q1
2.52
Min
0.88

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.61 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ZM

2.50

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

ZM’s P/B Ratio of 2.50 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

GDS vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGDSZM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.5721.32
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.395.33
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.612.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--13.73