Seek Returns logo

GDS vs. XYZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GDS and XYZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, XYZ is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolGDSXYZ
Company NameGDS Holdings LimitedBlock, Inc.
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustryIT ServicesFinancial Services
Market Capitalization7.81 billion USD44.91 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNYSE
Listing DateNovember 2, 2016November 19, 2015
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GDS and XYZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GDS vs. XYZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGDSXYZ
5-Day Price Return-0.25%-0.38%
13-Week Price Return41.88%7.51%
26-Week Price Return50.68%28.79%
52-Week Price Return-19.97%9.34%
Month-to-Date Return18.72%1.56%
Year-to-Date Return75.79%-13.64%
10-Day Avg. Volume12.22M7.01M
3-Month Avg. Volume10.28M9.33M
3-Month Volatility64.12%39.48%
Beta1.882.67

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GDS

19.17%

IT Services Industry

Max
32.78%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.86%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-10.00%

GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.17% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

XYZ

13.95%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

XYZ’s Return on Equity of 13.95% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GDS vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

42.87%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.71%
Q3
11.01%
Median
6.66%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-6.22%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 42.87% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

XYZ

12.41%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

XYZ’s Net Profit Margin of 12.41% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GDS vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

22.44%

IT Services Industry

Max
22.44%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.82%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.89%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.44% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

XYZ

4.82%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

XYZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.82% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

GDS vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGDSXYZ
Return on Equity (TTM)19.17%13.95%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.08%8.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)42.87%12.41%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.44%4.82%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.45%39.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

2.00

IT Services Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
2.00
Median
1.47
Q1
1.05
Min
0.52

GDS’s Current Ratio of 2.00 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

XYZ

1.96

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

GDS vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.82

IT Services Industry

Max
3.11
Q3
1.55
Median
0.55
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.82. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

XYZ

0.26

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

GDS vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
0.77
Min
-28.15

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

XYZ

12.18

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

GDS vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGDSXYZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.001.96
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.931.92
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.820.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.6612.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

GDS vs. XYZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GDS vs. XYZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.79%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

XYZ

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

XYZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GDS vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
107.85%
Q3
52.62%
Median
22.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

XYZ

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

XYZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GDS vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGDSXYZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GDS

12.57

IT Services Industry

Max
56.41
Q3
33.17
Median
23.17
Q1
16.18
Min
6.62

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 12.57 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

XYZ

15.07

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

XYZ’s P/E Ratio of 15.07 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GDS vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GDS

5.39

IT Services Industry

Max
5.99
Q3
4.26
Median
1.93
Q1
0.97
Min
0.12

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 5.39 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

XYZ

1.87

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

GDS vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.61

IT Services Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.54
Median
3.84
Q1
2.52
Min
0.88

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.61 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

XYZ

1.89

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

XYZ’s P/B Ratio of 1.89 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GDS vs. XYZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGDSXYZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.5715.07
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.391.87
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.611.89
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--41.56