Seek Returns logo

GDS vs. UI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GDS and UI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, UI is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolGDSUI
Company NameGDS Holdings LimitedUbiquiti Inc.
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryIT ServicesCommunications Equipment
Market Capitalization7.81 billion USD40.80 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNYSE
Listing DateNovember 2, 2016October 14, 2011
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GDS and UI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GDS vs. UI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGDSUI
5-Day Price Return-0.25%3.45%
13-Week Price Return41.88%60.47%
26-Week Price Return50.68%110.18%
52-Week Price Return-19.97%200.36%
Month-to-Date Return18.72%25.08%
Year-to-Date Return75.79%99.01%
10-Day Avg. Volume12.22M0.20M
3-Month Avg. Volume10.28M0.14M
3-Month Volatility64.12%74.34%
Beta1.881.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GDS

19.17%

IT Services Industry

Max
32.78%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.86%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-10.00%

GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.17% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UI

179.90%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
20.90%
Median
9.10%
Q1
4.29%
Min
-13.50%

UI’s Return on Equity of 179.90% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GDS vs. UI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

42.87%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.71%
Q3
11.01%
Median
6.66%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-6.22%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 42.87% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

UI

27.66%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
12.56%
Median
5.62%
Q1
2.50%
Min
-3.09%

UI’s Net Profit Margin of 27.66% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

GDS vs. UI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

22.44%

IT Services Industry

Max
22.44%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.82%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.89%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.44% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UI

32.50%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
25.23%
Q3
13.72%
Median
6.44%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-10.95%

UI’s Operating Profit Margin of 32.50% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

GDS vs. UI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGDSUI
Return on Equity (TTM)19.17%179.90%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.08%55.77%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)42.87%27.66%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.44%32.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.45%43.42%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

2.00

IT Services Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
2.00
Median
1.47
Q1
1.05
Min
0.52

GDS’s Current Ratio of 2.00 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UI

1.65

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
2.13
Median
1.55
Q1
1.15
Min
0.91

UI’s Current Ratio of 1.65 aligns with the median group of the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GDS vs. UI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.82

IT Services Industry

Max
3.11
Q3
1.55
Median
0.55
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.82. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

UI

0.37

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.86
Median
0.53
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

UI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GDS vs. UI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
0.77
Min
-28.15

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

UI

27.30

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
34.19
Median
7.59
Q1
3.73
Min
-9.94

UI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 27.30 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GDS vs. UI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGDSUI
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.001.65
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.930.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.820.37
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.6627.30

Growth

Revenue Growth

GDS vs. UI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GDS vs. UI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.79%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UI

0.36%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
8.13%
Q3
3.29%
Median
0.94%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UI’s Dividend Yield of 0.36% is consistent with its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GDS vs. UI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
107.85%
Q3
52.62%
Median
22.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UI

20.39%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
70.91%
Median
30.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.39% is within the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GDS vs. UI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGDSUI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.36%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%20.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GDS

12.57

IT Services Industry

Max
56.41
Q3
33.17
Median
23.17
Q1
16.18
Min
6.62

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 12.57 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

UI

57.28

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
103.74
Q3
61.65
Median
26.20
Q1
18.12
Min
4.19

UI’s P/E Ratio of 57.28 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GDS vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GDS

5.39

IT Services Industry

Max
5.99
Q3
4.26
Median
1.93
Q1
0.97
Min
0.12

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 5.39 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UI

15.84

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.86
Q3
6.24
Median
2.44
Q1
1.02
Min
0.48

With a P/S Ratio of 15.84, UI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communications Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GDS vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.61

IT Services Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.54
Median
3.84
Q1
2.52
Min
0.88

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.61 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

UI

37.26

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.28
Q3
5.73
Median
3.32
Q1
2.02
Min
0.42

At 37.26, UI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GDS vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGDSUI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.5757.28
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.3915.84
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.6137.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--64.99