Seek Returns logo

GDS vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GDS and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

GDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, UBER is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolGDSUBER
Company NameGDS Holdings LimitedUber Technologies, Inc.
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryIT ServicesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization6.76 billion USD195.47 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNYSE
Listing DateNovember 2, 2016May 10, 2019
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GDS and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GDS vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGDSUBER
5-Day Price Return-4.28%2.55%
13-Week Price Return11.79%1.37%
26-Week Price Return-4.13%16.74%
52-Week Price Return-19.97%26.35%
Month-to-Date Return-11.83%6.81%
Year-to-Date Return37.28%55.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume10.23M18.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.68M20.55M
3-Month Volatility62.39%29.59%
Beta1.541.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GDS

19.12%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.12% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GDS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

41.75%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 41.75% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GDS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GDS

21.69%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.69% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GDS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGDSUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)19.12%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.88%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)41.75%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.69%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.12%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.47

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

GDS’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GDS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.75

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.75. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GDS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GDS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGDSUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.471.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.290.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.750.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.66-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

GDS vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GDS vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GDS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GDS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGDSUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GDS

10.47

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 10.47 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GDS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GDS

4.37

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 4.37 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GDS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GDS

1.41

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.41 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GDS vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGDSUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.4715.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.374.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.418.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--22.90